2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2008.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compound framework for sports results prediction: A football case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…al., 2006) demonstrated the importance of supplementing data with expert judgement by showing that an expert constructed Bayesian network was more accurate in generating football match forecasts for matches involving Tottenham Hotspurt than machine learners of MC4, naive Bayes, Bayesian learning and K-nearest neighbour. A model that combined a Bayesian network along with a rule-based reasoner appeared to provide reasonable World Cup forecasts in (Min et al, 2008) through simulating various predifined strategies along with subjective information, whereas in (Baio & Blangiardo, 2010) a hierarchical Bayesian network model that did not incorporate subjective judgments appeared to be inferior in predicting football results when compared to standard Poisson distribution models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2006) demonstrated the importance of supplementing data with expert judgement by showing that an expert constructed Bayesian network was more accurate in generating football match forecasts for matches involving Tottenham Hotspurt than machine learners of MC4, naive Bayes, Bayesian learning and K-nearest neighbour. A model that combined a Bayesian network along with a rule-based reasoner appeared to provide reasonable World Cup forecasts in (Min et al, 2008) through simulating various predifined strategies along with subjective information, whereas in (Baio & Blangiardo, 2010) a hierarchical Bayesian network model that did not incorporate subjective judgments appeared to be inferior in predicting football results when compared to standard Poisson distribution models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system has some similarities with [13], although the reasoning system based on FCA is qualitative while the cited system is hybrid (bayesian reasoning). Pure qualitative reasoning was selected based on the aim of discovering trends (under a contextual selection) represented in the form of association rules with high confidence.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, one can work with hybrid models, and rarely with pure qualitative and exogenous reasoning systems appear in literature, although their use is considered for experiments (for example, frugal methods [3] and based on the recognition heuristic [10]) or as part of hybrid systems (see e.g. [13]). There are two reasons that may justify this point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning methods have been successfully applied in football. For example, in the prediction of match outcomes (Constantinou, Fenton, & Neil, 2012;Min, Kim, Choe, Eom, & McKay, 2008;Odachowski & Grekow, 2013;Strnad, Nerat, & Kohek, 2015;Tüfekci, 2016), analysis of team performance (Arruda Moura, Barreto Martins, & Augusto Cunha, 2013) or player's injury prediction (Arndt & Brefeld, 2016;Jelinek, Kelarev, Robinson, Stranieri, & Cornforth, 2014;Kampakis, 2011). However, the problem of characterizing and selecting players based on available data of performance using machine learning methods is an interesting and open field of research today.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%