2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive characterization of 3D surface topography induced by hard turning versus grinding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7. Waikar and Guo [24] reported that the number of peaks in a unit of sampling area measured for hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel with fresh CBN tools and feed of 0.0254 mm/rev is equal to Sds = 3996 pks/ mm^. This difference results from the number of tool traces generated at very small (0.0254/0.01 in.…”
Section: Geometrical Characteristics Of Turned and Burnishedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. Waikar and Guo [24] reported that the number of peaks in a unit of sampling area measured for hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel with fresh CBN tools and feed of 0.0254 mm/rev is equal to Sds = 3996 pks/ mm^. This difference results from the number of tool traces generated at very small (0.0254/0.01 in.…”
Section: Geometrical Characteristics Of Turned and Burnishedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waikar and Guo (2008) studied the surface topography obtained by turning and grinding work material of AISI 52100 steel, obtaining a final hardness of 61 -62 HRC. For the ground fresh surface, considered as isotropic finishing, they found the following 3D superficial texture parameters:…”
Section: Model Validation With Steel Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of computer-controlled three-dimensional profilemeters in recent decades has allowed the use of this technique to characterize machined surfaces more realistically. Waikar and Guo [14] compared the topography of turned and ground hardened AISI 52100 steel (62 HRC) and reported that, additionally to the regular pattern produced on the surface by the combination of feed rate and tool nose radius when turning (against the random pattern observed after grinding), in general the surface produced by gentle grinding presented loweramplitude parameters (S a , S q , S p , S v , S t , and S z ) compared with turning using fresh and worn inserts and with dry grinding. As far as the functional parameters skewness (S sk ) and kurtosis (S ku ) are concerned, only the surface generated by gentle grinding presented negative S sk , thus indicating superior fluid retention ability, while only abusive grinding produced a surface with S ku higher than three (height distribution with low standard deviation).…”
Section: Surface Finishmentioning
confidence: 99%