2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Coding System to Measure the Quality of School Wellness Policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
131
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Coding agreement was high (ranging from 94% to 97%), and discrepancies were resolved through discussion among the coders and the lead author. The original PE time policy coding schemes ranged from a strong policy that met the National Association for Sport and Physical Education recommendation of 150 minutes of PE per week (ES) and 225 minutes of PE per week (MS) (level 2 code), 24 a lesser requirement or only a suggested time standard (level 1 code), to no law/policy (level 0 code).…”
Section: Analytic Variables Policy Predictors (Independent Variables)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Coding agreement was high (ranging from 94% to 97%), and discrepancies were resolved through discussion among the coders and the lead author. The original PE time policy coding schemes ranged from a strong policy that met the National Association for Sport and Physical Education recommendation of 150 minutes of PE per week (ES) and 225 minutes of PE per week (MS) (level 2 code), 24 a lesser requirement or only a suggested time standard (level 1 code), to no law/policy (level 0 code).…”
Section: Analytic Variables Policy Predictors (Independent Variables)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review shows the lack of consistency when reporting on measurement properties of such tools, with 7 studies out of 11 reporting both validity and reliability properties of environmental characteristics audit tools, and 4 studies reporting on either validity or reliability properties of such tools. For example, Kim et al, 23 and Schwartz et al, 22 reported only the reliability of the CHLI and the WellSAT tools, respectively. Henderson et al, 12 reported on only the validity of their newly developed tool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strength was determined by assessing the proportion of competitive food and beverage-related items (out of 57) that were definitively required in a given district’s policy. The measure built on the original strength score developed by Schwartz et al, who had assessed strength of a series of location restrictions and nutrient standards across locations of sale (Schwartz et al, 2009). Our measure assessed the strength of 12 overarching provisions as well as 15 nutrient-specific standards for each of 3 locations of sale where most competitive food items are purchased at the secondary school level (i.e., vending machines, school stores, and a la carte lines) (Chriqui et al, 2013; Terry-McElrath et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%