2011
DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073-13.3.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of four disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS): glatiramer acetate (GA; Copaxone), interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a) intramuscular (IM) injection (Avonex), IFNβ-1a subcutaneous (SC) injection (Rebif), and interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b) SC injection (Betaseron). Cost-effectiveness analyses are useful in countering the financial uncertainties and treatment efficacy concerns faced by people with MS. We conducted simulation anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observed differences may be due to many different reasons including the dosing regimens used and differences in the molecular structure or post-translational modifications. The lower immunogenicity of Avonex™ needs to be balanced against the relative cost-effectiveness, which may be as favourable when compared to the other formulations [65]. Currently, European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) guidelines suggest patients treated with IFN-β are investigated for the presence of NAbs at 12 and 24 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These observed differences may be due to many different reasons including the dosing regimens used and differences in the molecular structure or post-translational modifications. The lower immunogenicity of Avonex™ needs to be balanced against the relative cost-effectiveness, which may be as favourable when compared to the other formulations [65]. Currently, European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) guidelines suggest patients treated with IFN-β are investigated for the presence of NAbs at 12 and 24 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With an average of 17.65 years until the first positive test in these patients, and assuming they became positive within the first two years of treatment [ 34 ], they have had less efficient treatment for over a decade. With the yearly cost of IFNβ-1b-Betaferon treatment ranging from $16,000–$25,000 [ 40 , 41 ], the total cost of a patient found positive after two years of treatment would be up to $391,250 (15.65 x $25,000) per person. These types of overall health care costs and benefits have to be considered for all current used BPs individually in conjunction with costs for ADA screening, but might be especially beneficial for very expensive drugs if these are monoclonal antibodies where ADA can be detected early after treatment initiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple sclerosis disease-modifying treatments are expensive and of long duration, and their effectiveness to delay the SP stage of the disease is debatable. The costs of diseasemodifying therapies, such as fingolimod and natalizumab, average approximately $30 000 per year per patient, [3][4][5] and additional indirect costs associated with MS treatment push the total costs even higher.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%