2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive exergy-based evaluation on cascade absorption-compression refrigeration system for low temperature applications - exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where E is the exergy;ṁ is the mass flow rate; and e ph and e ch are the physical and chemical exergies, respectively, which are described in Eqs. ( 6) and ( 7) (Mousavi and Mehrpooya, 2020):…”
Section: Exergy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where E is the exergy;ṁ is the mass flow rate; and e ph and e ch are the physical and chemical exergies, respectively, which are described in Eqs. ( 6) and ( 7) (Mousavi and Mehrpooya, 2020):…”
Section: Exergy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shokati et al [81] analyzed an ammonia-water double effect absorption refrigeration/Kalina cogeneration cycle, and obtained very low f k values for the condenser, high-pressure steam generator, and boiler, and concluded that selection of these components with higher quality and price can improve the overall performance of the cogeneration cycle. Mousavi and Mehrpooya [87] reported on a cascade absorption-compression refrigeration system, and after evaluation of r k and f k , decided that the compressor and gas heat exchanger presented the best potential for optimization. Wang et al [88] explored a novel cooling and power cycle and identified the vapor generator #1 and solution heat exchanger as possibilities for optimization due to the high r k and low f k .…”
Section: D )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above results are evaluated using a classic LCA but a novel approach named prospective LCA also exists and may bring to different findings. This methodology is commonly used to compare systems having different maturity levels: the future characteristics of emerging technologies can be forecasted to valorize their future potential [50].…”
Section: Lcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 is useful to understand that, in each month, the impact of the exergy destructions is higher than that of the components' life cycle, and that the total environmental impact varies in a range between 14.0 and 24.5 Pts/day. Energy systems fueled by fossils are typically characterized by high-impact exergy destructions because of the specific environmental burden of the fuel [50]. Contrarily, in this case, the contribution of life cycle impacts (in blue) is lower but not negligible compared to the exergy destructions impacts (in orange).…”
Section: Y K +mentioning
confidence: 99%