A comprehensive framework and literature review of supplier selection under different purchasing strategies

Saputro, Thomy Eko; Figueira, Gonçalo; Almada-Lobo, Bernardo

doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108010

Cited by 50 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 340 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 94%

“…In addition, rights of stakeholders, employment practices and respect for policies appear in 21%, 17% and 16%, respectively. This is consistent with what has been found by (Saputro et al, 2022). As mentioned before, a social criterion is less considered than other sustainability criteria.…”

Section: Supplier Selection Criteriasupporting

confidence: 93%

“…As shown in Figure 6, cost, quality and delivery are the most considered criteria. Rashidi et al (2020), Saputro et al (2022), Tuczek and Wakolbinger (2018) confirm these findings. This fact has been seen since 1966 (Tuczek and Wakolbinger, 2018).…”

Section: Supplier Selection Criteriasupporting

confidence: 74%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Sustainable and resilient supplier selection in the context of circular economy: an ontology-based model

Echefaj

Charkaoui

Cherrafi

et al. 2023

MEQ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeSelecting the optimal supplier is a challenging managerial decision that involves several dimensions that vary over time. Despite the considerable attention devoted to this issue, knowledge is required to be updated and analyzed in this field. This paper reveals new opportunities to advance supplier selection (SS) research from a multidimensional perspective. Moreover, this study aims to formalise SS knowledge to enable the appropriate selection of sustainable, resilient and circular criteria.Design/methodology/approachThis study is developed in two stages: first, a systematic literature review is conducted to select relevant papers. Descriptive and thematic analyses are employed to analyze criteria, solving approaches and case studies. Second, a criterion knowledge-based framework is developed and validated by experts to be implemented as ontology using Protégé software.FindingsEvaluating the viability of suppliers need further studies to integrate other criteria and to align SS objectives with research advancement. Artificial intelligence tools are needed to revolutionize and optimize the traditional techniques used to solve this problem. Literature lucks frameworks for specific sectors. The proposed ontology provides a consistent criteria knowledge base.Practical implicationsFor academics, the results of this study highlight opportunities to improve the viable SS process. From a managerial perspective, the proposed ontology can assist managers in selecting the appropriate criteria. Future works can enrich the proposed ontology and integrate this knowledge base into an information system.Originality/valueThis study contributes to promoting knowledge about viable SS. Capitalizing the knowledge base of criteria in a computer-interpretable manner supports the digitalization of this critical decision.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 94%

Section: Supplier Selection Criteriasupporting

confidence: 93%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sustainable and resilient supplier selection in the context of circular economy: an ontology-based model

Echefaj

Charkaoui

Cherrafi

et al. 2023

MEQ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Supplier selection has garnered considerable attention in the literature since it is seen as one of the primary success drivers for a business. Selecting the best suppliers for various product items demands a good issue formulation and strategy (Saputro et al ., 2022). It is of great significance if proper suppliers can be effectively selected during the procurement process.…”

Section: Literature Review: Supplier Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supplier selection criteria using analytical hierarchy process (AHP)-based approach: a study in refractory materials manufacturers

Lin

Chuang

Ling

et al. 2023

IMDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeRefractory materials are now used in all major industries that demand high-temperature resistance, including petrochemicals, steel, cement and aviation. Businesses must decrease operating costs, enhance product technology, sell well and manage corporate risks in decision-making, notably supplier selection, to be more competitive. The study aims to determine the key criteria and factors of supplier selection and to evaluate the importance of the key factor of the supplier selection criteria for the refractory materials manufacturers in Taiwan.Design/methodology/approachAnalytical hierarchy process (AHP) is used to rank these factors for the decision maker. The AHP method is suitable for verifying refractory supplier selection criteria and providing references. The weighted loss scores for each supplier are then determined using the relative importance as the weights. Supplier selection criteria are ranked using their aggregate weighted loss scores. The provider with the lowest loss score should be chosen.FindingsProduct quality is the most significant of the five criteria: product quality, production technology, logistics capacity, service capability and supplier background. Professionalism is the most significant aspect of product quality, whereas equipment and capacity are vital in manufacturing techniques. The studies also show that the delivery rate is essential for logistics and service capabilities.Practical implicationsThis research has important implications for refractory suppliers in promptly fine-tuning the production and service to enhance customer satisfaction, which is key to business sustainability.Originality/valueThe application of an AHP technique to a real-world industrial issue is what makes this research unique. This research addressed one of the most critical topics in supply chain operations by offering better judgement for supplier selection via the use of suitable quantitative methodologies.

show abstract

“…Kumar and Barman (2021) believed that environment friendly materials and environment friendly technology were necessary indicators in criteria construction. Saputro et al (2022) figured out that quality, cost, and delivery are usually adopted criteria, and technology factors and environment-related factors were measured as well. Rahman et al (2022) believed that there was a need to improve green-related factors with the increasing awareness of environment sustainability.…”

Section: Criteria For Supplier Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A multi-criteria decision-making framework for electric vehicle supplier selection of government agencies and public bodies in China

Wei

Chao

2022

Environ Sci Pollut Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electric vehicle deployment shows promising potentials in promoting cleaner energy utilization and reducing carbon emission. Due to increasing carbon neutral pressure and market competition from transportation sector, government agencies and public bodies (GAPBs) have emphasized the significance of electric vehicle adoption through supplier selection. Consequently, GAPBs must consider a reasonable criteria system and a comprehensive supplier selection framework and rationally select the electric vehicle supplier that matches their practical needs in terms of economic, social, environmental, and technical factors. This paper provides insights into electric vehicle supplier selection (EVSS) from the perspective of GAPBs using an integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework based on best-worst method (BWM) and fuzzy ViseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). Initially, 14 critical factors from economic, social, environmental, and technical dimensions are identified as the criteria by literature review and experts' opinions. Then, a comprehensive decision framework using the integrated MCDM approach is proposed. To validate the applicability and feasibility of the proposed framework, a case study is launched and analyzed. It emerges that bad environmental record, cost, quality, service, and environmental initiatives are the most important criteria in EVSS for GAPBs with the weight values of 0.1995, 0.1172, 0.1219, 0.0708, and 0.2553. The comparative analysis and the sensitivity analysis are performed for verifying the reliability of the proposed framework. The work helps to understand the electric vehicle supplier selection criteria and makes methodological decision-making support for GAPBs.

show abstract

A comprehensive framework and literature review of supplier selection under different purchasing strategies

Cited by 50 publications

References 340 publications

Sustainable and resilient supplier selection in the context of circular economy: an ontology-based model

Sustainable and resilient supplier selection in the context of circular economy: an ontology-based model

Supplier selection criteria using analytical hierarchy process (AHP)-based approach: a study in refractory materials manufacturers

A multi-criteria decision-making framework for electric vehicle supplier selection of government agencies and public bodies in China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About