2009
DOI: 10.1117/12.804834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive model of catastrophic optical-damage in broad-area laser diodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These defect networks are not topic of this report. However the appearance of those, which are created in standard tests [17,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] and in single-pulse step tests [4,9], are absolutely similar. Therefore we consider it very likely that COD in broad-area lasers takes place in the same way during single-pulse step tests and cw operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These defect networks are not topic of this report. However the appearance of those, which are created in standard tests [17,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] and in single-pulse step tests [4,9], are absolutely similar. Therefore we consider it very likely that COD in broad-area lasers takes place in the same way during single-pulse step tests and cw operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The defect serves as the starting point for the creation of a defect network within the plane of the waveguide. This topic has been extensively studied in the literature [17,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] and modeled [4,9,28], and will not be further considered here. In case of single-pulse tests with only one high pulse resulting in a high overload at the facet, the damaged front facet area correlates with the power [18,31].…”
Section: Single-pulse (Step) Tests: Technical Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst facet passivation techniques can effectively suppress or delay catastrophic optical mirror damage (COMD) extending emitter reliability into several hundreds thousands of hours, other, less dominant, failure modes such as intra-chip catastrophic optical bulk damage (COBD) become apparent [1]. Imaging through a window opened in the metallization on the substrate (n) side of a p-side down mounted emitter has provided valuable insight into both COMD [2,3] and COBD failure mechanisms [1,4]. Various analytical techniques [1][2][3][4] such as electroluminescence (EL), cathodoluminescence (EBIC, (S)TEM and FIB/SEM [4]), microphotoluminescence (μ-PL) [2] (including time resolved), and deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) [4], have been employed to characterize failure sites inside the emitter, which are observed typically as dark line defects (DLDs) extending over a significant length of the laser cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various analytical techniques [1][2][3][4] such as electroluminescence (EL), cathodoluminescence (EBIC, (S)TEM and FIB/SEM [4]), microphotoluminescence (μ-PL) [2] (including time resolved), and deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) [4], have been employed to characterize failure sites inside the emitter, which are observed typically as dark line defects (DLDs) extending over a significant length of the laser cavity. DLDs were found to be consistent with ring cavity modes [3], and contain non-radiative defects such as EL2 traps [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst facet passivation techniques can effectively suppress or delay catastrophic optical mirror damage (COMD) extending emitter reliability into several hundreds thousands of hours, other, less dominant, failure modes such as intra-chip catastrophic optical bulk damage (COBD) become apparent [1]. Imaging through a window opened in the metallization on the substrate (n) side of a p-side down mounted emitter has provided valuable insight into both COMD [2], [3] and COBD failure mechanisms [1], [4]. Various analytical techniques [1]- [4] such as electroluminescence (EL), cathodoluminescence (EBIC, (S)TEM and FIB/SEM [4]), micro-photoluminescence (μ-PL) [2] (including time resolved), and deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) [4], have been employed to characterize failure sites inside the emitter, which are observed typically as dark line defects (DLDs) extending over a significant length of the laser cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%