2011
DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-9749-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive numerical study of aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions in marine stratocumulus

Abstract: Abstract. Three-dimensional large-eddy simulations (LES) with detailed bin-resolved microphysics are performed to explore the diurnal variation of marine stratocumulus (MSc) clouds under clean and polluted conditions. The sensitivity of the aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions to variation of sea surface temperature, free tropospheric humidity, largescale divergence rate, and wind speed is assessed. The comprehensive set of simulations corroborates previous studies that (1) with moderate/heavy drizzle, an … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(124 reference statements)
5
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aerosol indirect effects (AIEs), broadly defined here as the effect of aerosols on the cloud albedo, are strongly sensitive to the amount of drizzle falling from warm clouds (Rotstayn and Liu, 2005) and to the amount evaporating below cloud (Wood, 2007;Chen et al, 2011). The AIEs have been difficult to quantify, in part because different cloud types respond differently to perturbations in aerosol concentration (Ackerman, 2004;Stevens and Feingold, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerosol indirect effects (AIEs), broadly defined here as the effect of aerosols on the cloud albedo, are strongly sensitive to the amount of drizzle falling from warm clouds (Rotstayn and Liu, 2005) and to the amount evaporating below cloud (Wood, 2007;Chen et al, 2011). The AIEs have been difficult to quantify, in part because different cloud types respond differently to perturbations in aerosol concentration (Ackerman, 2004;Stevens and Feingold, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of LES is its ability to resolve turbulent eddies. LES are often idealized and conducted with small domains (on the order of 10 2 km 2 or smaller) to study the equilibrium state or diurnal cycle of clouds under horizontally uniform forcing conditions (e.g., Berner et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2011;Lu and Seinfeld, 2005;Sandu et al, 2008;Wang and McFarquhar, 2008a, b). With a relatively large domain (on the order of 10 4 km 2 ), the LES can simulate the response of mesoscale cloud structures to aerosol perturbations, but only in very ideal meteorological scenarios with prescribed large-scale forcings (Kazil et al, 2011;Mechem et al, 2012;Wang and Feingold, 2009a, b).…”
Section: Q Yang Et Al: Impact Of Natural and Anthropogenic Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly uncertain are the ones influencing the radiative balance and properties of clouds, such as the number size distribution, chemical composition and particle mixing state. The lack of a proper representation concerning size distributions of the aerosol in global and regional models is a major reason why direct and the indirect climate effects (Twomey 1974;Albrecht 1989;Chen et al, 2011) of the atmospheric aerosols constitute the largest uncertainty in our present understanding of the anthropogenic climate forcing (IPCC, 2007). Atmospheric aerosol particles span over several orders of magnitude in diameter (D p ), from a few nanometer to hundreds of micrometer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%