A comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the UK FIM + FAM

Abstract

Purpose:To evaluate the psychometric properties of the UK FIM + FAM.Methods:(a) A systematic literature review integrating the evidence for psychometric qualities of both the original and UK versions, and (b) exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of admission/discharge data from an inpatient general neuro-rehabilitation cohort using parametric and non-parametric techniques. A prospective cohort of 459 patients with a male:female ratio of 57:43 and mean age of 44.5 (SD 14.3) years participated in this study.Results:Seven published articles together demonstrated acceptable utility, concurrent validity, inter-rater reliability and responsiveness of the UK FIM + FAM. Factor analysis demonstrated that all items loaded high (>0.58) on the first principal component and distinct motor and cognitive factors emerged after rotation. A four-factor solution also demonstrated four distinct, interpretable dimensions (Physical, Psychosocial, Communication and Extended Activities of Everyday Living (EADL)). Mokken analysis of the second data set confirmed these dimensions. Cronbach’s αs were 0.97 and 0.96 for the motor and cognitive domains and 0.90–0.97 for the subscales. Analysis of responsiveness demonstrated “large” effect sizes (0.86–1.29).Conclusions:The UK FIM + FAM, including the newer EADL module, is a valid, reliable scale of functional independence. It has high internal consistency in two domains and four subscales and is responsive to changes occurring in a general inpatient neuro-rehabilitation population.Implications for RehabilitationThe UK FIM + FAM is a valid, reliable scale of functional independence, which is responsive to changes occurring in a general inpatient neuro-rehabilitation population.Physical, Psychosocial, Communication It can be used to derive a reliable, single score of overall independence and also yields specific information in two main domains and four separate subscales of independence: Physical, Psychosocial, Communication and Extended Activities of Daily Living (EADL).The newer EADL item module provides added value, measuring functional independence for community-based activities.

A structured multicomponent group programme for carers of people with acquired brain injury: Effects on perceived criticism, strain, and psychological distress

“…It was originally developed under the auspices of the US National Task Force of Rehabilitation Research and has been further developed in the United Kingdom as an assessment of functioning in ABI, showing it to be a psychometrically robust measure (Hawley, Taylor, Hellawell, & Pentland, 1999;Turner-Stokes & Siegert, 2013;Valk-Kleibeuker, Heijenbrok-Kal, & Ribbers, 2014). Each item is scored on seven levels, to give a range of 30-210.…”

Overview of reviews of standardised occupation‐based instruments for use in occupational therapy practice

“…There may be other instruments that are relevant to occupational therapy practice that were not identified in this overview. Second, the included systematic reviews used different foci for their revieweither on the instruments, as in Turner-Stokes and Siegert (2013) or based on conditions as in James et al (2014). Both methods have strengths and weaknesses.…”

The patient categorisation tool: psychometric evaluation of a tool to measure complexity of needs for rehabilitation in a large multicentre dataset from the United Kingdom

“…The UK FIM þ FAM is a 30-item measure of functional independence (total score range 30-210) comprising 16 "Motor" items relating to self-care, transfers and mobility (score range 16-112) and 14 "Cognitive" items related to cognitive and psychosocial function (score range 14-98) [8]. It forms the principal outcome measure for the UKROC dataset.…”