2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03240-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive qualitative framework for health-related quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Abstract: Purpose Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare x-linked neuromuscular condition predominantly affecting boys and men. There is a paucity of research qualitatively detailing the lived experience of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for people with DMD. The aim of this study was to identify a comprehensive framework for better understanding HRQoL in DMD. Methods Eighteen boys and men (aged 7 to ≥ 40 years) with DMD were recruited from charity Duche… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considerations of the lived experience of individuals with Duchenne could help produce accurate information on QALYs gained due to DMD therapies, leading to more precise assessments of value. These considerations are reflected in a recently developed 30-item, 6-category (autonomy, daily activities, feelings and emotions, identity, physical aspects, social relationships) framework that captures quality of life in DMD from the perspective of boys and men with the disease [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerations of the lived experience of individuals with Duchenne could help produce accurate information on QALYs gained due to DMD therapies, leading to more precise assessments of value. These considerations are reflected in a recently developed 30-item, 6-category (autonomy, daily activities, feelings and emotions, identity, physical aspects, social relationships) framework that captures quality of life in DMD from the perspective of boys and men with the disease [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%