Green hydrogen plays a key role in
decarbonizing the economy. However,
the best conditions for producing it are often far from consumption
places. This work compares three alternatives for large-scale green
hydrogen distribution based on the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH):
the use of green ammonia as a hydrogen carrier, the use of liquid
hydrogen, and on-site production. All of the alternatives include
production, packing, transport, and unpacking of hydrogen. Results
show that liquid hydrogen outperforms the other alternatives in most
cases. Only if the renewable electricity price in the destination
site and hydrogen demand are low enough does on-site production become
attractive. A demand of 1 MtH2
/y leads to a
LCOH equal to 5.14 USD/kgH2
when imported by
ship as liquid hydrogen from 7,200 km away and considering electricity
prices of 40 USD/MWh in the production site and 100 USD/MWh in the
destination. Analogously, LCOH is 9.01 USD/kgH2
when produced in situ and 10.25 USD/kgH2
using
ammonia as a hydrogen carrier. The ammonia alternative is attractive
if ammonia is the desired good at the destination, or when it does
not matter to import any of both fuels from the levelized cost of
energy viewpoint. Blue hydrogen LCOH is estimated to be 65% cheaper
than green hydrogen under similar scenarios.