2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive survey and taxonomy of sign language research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although LSTM and GRU are efficient for learning time-series data, these algorithms lack the capability of CNN for learning the spatial features of the input data [ 146 ]. To overcome this problem, several researchers employed CNN as a feature extractor and fed these features into a time-series learning technique, such as LSTM or GRU.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although LSTM and GRU are efficient for learning time-series data, these algorithms lack the capability of CNN for learning the spatial features of the input data [ 146 ]. To overcome this problem, several researchers employed CNN as a feature extractor and fed these features into a time-series learning technique, such as LSTM or GRU.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the availability of sign language databases is limited, which is one of the most significant issues facing sign language recognition and translation systems. Finding a dataset that has manual and non-manual gestures at the same time is challenging [ 24 , 40 ]. Researchers in this field must create a reasonably sized database from scratch to implement and examine their sign language recognition system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interaction between the smart glove and computer is a clear example of human–computer interaction. There are two types of sensor-based methods used in sign language acquisition: sensors that can only detect finger bending and sensors that detect hand motion and orientation [ 23 , 24 ]. For more detailed information, we suggest reading the comprehensive survey paper “Systems-based sensory gloves for sign language recognition” [ 23 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach reported an accuracy of 99.8% on the static signs of ASL. For more details about the deep learning techniques utilized for sign language recognition, we refer to this survey [42].…”
Section: B Vision-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%