A comprehensive survey on vehicular Ad Hoc network

Al-Sultan, Saif; Al-Doori, Moath; Al-Bayatti, Ali H.; Zedan, Hussein

doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2013.02.036

Cited by 1,177 publications

(613 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

598

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Broadcast storms make channel capacity to be overloaded, causing channel congestion that reduces communication reliability. Broadcast protocol is suitable only for small number of vehicles in the network [7][8].…”

Section: Broadcast Routing Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Evaluation for a Unicast Non Delay Tolerant Position based Routing Protocols in VANETs

Abdalla¹

2018

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vehicular Ad hoc Networks are special kind of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. VANET is an emerging technology, which enables an extensive range of applications, including road safety, passenger convenience, self-driven vehicles, and intelligent transportation.Routing in Vehicular Ad hoc Networks is a challenging task due to the unique characteristics of the network. Unicast routing protocols in VANETs are the most fundamental protocols in ad hoc environment and they form the basis for constructing other types of protocols. Unicast routing protocols further classified into topology based, position based, cluster based and hybrid protocols.In this paper protocols belonging to unicast non-delay tolerant position based are discussed. We have implemented our comparison on the NS2 simulator. Simulation of NDT routing protocols A-STAR, CAR, and GyTAR are carried out and the results are presented.

show abstract

Section: Broadcast Routing Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Evaluation for a Unicast Non Delay Tolerant Position based Routing Protocols in VANETs

Abdalla¹

2018

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The unique features of VANETs include fast-moving vehicles that follow pre-determined paths (i.e., roads) and messages with different priority levels. For example, messages for comfort and infotainment applications have low priority, while messages for traffic safety applications require timely and reliable message delivery [31]. Using the on-board unit, vehicles can communicate among themselves (vehicle-to-vehicle, V2V) and with roadside units (vehicle-to-infrastructure, V2I).…”

Section: Siov Technologies and Components: Next Generation Of Vehiclesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Internet of Vehicles for Smart Cities

Μαγλαράς

Al-Bayatti

et al. 2016

JSAN

138

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital devices are becoming increasingly ubiquitous and interconnected. Their evolution to intelligent parts of a digital ecosystem creates novel applications with so far unresolved security issues. A particular example is a vehicle. As vehicles evolve from simple means of transportation to smart entities with new sensing and communication capabilities, they become active members of a smart city. The Internet of Vehicles (IoV) consists of vehicles that communicate with each other and with public networks through V2V (vehicle-to-vehicle), V2I (vehicle-to-infrastructure) and V2P (vehicle-to-pedestrian) interactions, which enables both the collection and the real-time sharing of critical information about the condition on the road network. The Social Internet of Things (SIoT) introduces social relationships among objects, creating a social network where the participants are not humans, but intelligent objects. In this article, we explore the concept of the Social Internet of Vehicles (SIoV), a network that enables social interactions both among vehicles and among drivers. We discuss technologies and components of the SIoV, possible applications and issues of security, privacy and trust that are likely to arise.

show abstract

“…The nodes in the network may act as routers and play a key role in establishing and maintaining routes between communicating nodes. Vehicles in VANET can communicate with each other directly forming what is known as Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) communication (Al-Sultan et al, 2014), or can communicate with Road Side Units (RSUs) forming Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) communication (Grover et al, 2012). The communication is established between vehicles based on the Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) which utilizes the IEEE 802.11p (Gerla and Kleinrock, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…VANETs have gained a lot of attraction in the past few years (Gerla and Kleinrock, 2011;Mejri et al, 2014;Al-Sultan et al, 2014;Thenmozhi and Govindarajan, 2016;Hager et al, 2015;Whaiduzzaman et al, 2014). A lot of challenges accompanied this hot area of research, these challenges are associated with various factors including highly dynamic topology caused by the high mobility and malicious communication disturbance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Routing and the Impact of Group Mobility Model in VANETs

Al‐Qassas¹

2016

Journal of Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Group vehicular applications could play a vital role in our life, whether these applications are safety-oriented or convenience-oriented applications. The group concept has also been used in support of many solutions in VANETs. Reference Point Group Mobility model (RPGM) is a popular group mobility model and has been used heavily in the literature. In order to study the impact of this mobility model on routing in VANETs, two well-known protocols are considered, namely AODV and AOMDV, as representatives of single-path and multipath routing, respectively. These protocols have shown performance merits over other routing protocols and they have a vital role in other wireless networks including MANETs and Wireless Mesh Networks. This paper provides a thorough evaluation of these protocols, by examining them under various potential realistic scenarios, under the RPGM mobility model. To the best of knowledge, this is the first study that examines the behaviour of the two protocols under the RPGM mobility model. The results from extensive simulations have shown that both protocols have comparable performance merits when the number of communicating nodes is low. However, increasing the number of communicating nodes has demonstrated a performance advantage for AOMDV, in the majority of the performance metrics used in the paper.

show abstract

A comprehensive survey on vehicular Ad Hoc network

Cited by 1,177 publications

References 28 publications

Performance Evaluation for a Unicast Non Delay Tolerant Position based Routing Protocols in VANETs

Performance Evaluation for a Unicast Non Delay Tolerant Position based Routing Protocols in VANETs

Social Internet of Vehicles for Smart Cities

Routing and the Impact of Group Mobility Model in VANETs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About