2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00229.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive systematic review of visitation models in adult critical care units within the context of patient- and family-centred care

Abstract: Flexible visiting policies provide the ability to incorporate the concepts of PFCC into practice. However, nurses believe that while visiting is beneficial to patients, open and/or flexible visiting hours are an impediment to practice and increase their workload. Recommendations for best practice were formulated based on the outcomes and include visiting hours should be used as guidelines, not rules, that allow flexibility dependent upon individual patient/family situation. With regard to congruence with PFCC,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
65
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although improved family satisfaction with less restrictive visitation policies is consistent with results of prior studies, 2,7,[10][11][12][13][14] improvement in the waiting room experience has not previously been demonstrated. One reason for the improved satisfaction may be that family members who spend less time in the waiting room may perceive it more favorably.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although improved family satisfaction with less restrictive visitation policies is consistent with results of prior studies, 2,7,[10][11][12][13][14] improvement in the waiting room experience has not previously been demonstrated. One reason for the improved satisfaction may be that family members who spend less time in the waiting room may perceive it more favorably.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…1,2 Such restrictions can be stressful to patients with support persons outside of the traditional immediate family. 3 In April 2010, President Barack Obama released a presidential memorandum regarding patient visitation policies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority were female (21), white (22), postgraduate (24) and worked for more than a year in the emergency unit (23), with professional experience ranging from six months to 15 years (average of 38.5 months of working).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 This finding draws attention because the evidences show that nurses, even considering beneficial the family visits to critically ill patients, believe that flexible schedules hinder the development of its procedures and would entail greater workload for professionals. 22 Certainly, is necessary a systematized work along the entire health care team so that the family is properly valued and incorporated into the emergency care process. A study conducted in the United States showed that, in general, the professionals working in emergency rooms felt that family members should be allowed to stay at the bedside during the service, but there are challenges, including the need for education and theoretical preparation of all health staff to facilitate practical attitudinal changes that promote family stay during the service.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven documents were included, seven literature reviews [8,[11][12][13][14][15][16] and four practice guidelines. [1,4,17,18] Among the seven reviews included, five were exclusively focussed on intensive care units (ICUs), [11,12,[14][15][16] while the other two were not confined to a specific type of unit. [8,13] While most of the reviews had the overarching goal of assessing and synthesizing evidence on the perceived impacts on patients, visitors and staff of open or flexible visiting policies, they varied in types of studies they included, indicators and methodologies they used to assess impacts.…”
Section: Perceived Impacts Of Open Visiting Policies and Pref-mentioning
confidence: 99%