2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive understanding of co-solvent effects on interfacial polymerization: Interaction with trimesoyl chloride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Young’ s equation, the spreading behavior of the hexane solution is related to interfacial tension as well as interfacial polymerization reaction process. As reported in the literature, 36 to better understand the mechanism of interfacial polymerization, several studies have put forth the idea that a co-solvent is likely to promote diamine diffusion because it can reduce the solubility difference or interfacial tension between two immiscible solutions. However, detailed mechanism studies are still lacking.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Young’ s equation, the spreading behavior of the hexane solution is related to interfacial tension as well as interfacial polymerization reaction process. As reported in the literature, 36 to better understand the mechanism of interfacial polymerization, several studies have put forth the idea that a co-solvent is likely to promote diamine diffusion because it can reduce the solubility difference or interfacial tension between two immiscible solutions. However, detailed mechanism studies are still lacking.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we tried to determine which is better between CB [6] and CB [7] as a building block for desalination membranes. CB [5] and CB [8] were excluded…”
Section: Qm Calculations To Weigh Up the Best Candidate Among Cucurbi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, reverse osmosis (RO) membranes are known to attain high rejections (~95%) of heavy metals [ 39 ]. This is attributed to the dense, highly cross-linked nature of the selective layer with small pore sizes of ~0.25–0.8 nm [ 26 , 40 ], thereby severely restricting the passage of dissolved heavy metals. However, the energy consumption of RO is high, and thus it is not favorable to use dense RO membranes for heavy metal removal.…”
Section: Recent Progress In Pollutant Removal Using Mixed Matrix Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%