Proceedings 11th Australasian Database Conference. ADC 2000 (Cat. No.PR00528)
DOI: 10.1109/adc.2000.819807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compression scheme for large databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is not viable for large document collections as a suffix array and other auxiliary data structures of the complete collection are required for encoding. Another set of related techniques are grammar compressors, such as ray [10], xray [11] and re-pair [21]. Grammar compressors can achieve powerful compression but have enormous construction requirements, limiting their application to smaller collections.…”
Section: Adaptive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is not viable for large document collections as a suffix array and other auxiliary data structures of the complete collection are required for encoding. Another set of related techniques are grammar compressors, such as ray [10], xray [11] and re-pair [21]. Grammar compressors can achieve powerful compression but have enormous construction requirements, limiting their application to smaller collections.…”
Section: Adaptive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the researches by Cormack (1985) and Moffat and Zobel (1997) are based on Huffman Coding. Cannane and Williams (2000) and Cockshott et al (1998) proposed database compression methods based on Dictionary Coding, while Ng and Ravishankar (1997) proposed a research based on Differencing Cording. Linoff and Stanfill (1993) proposed a database compression method that combines Differencing Coding, Run Length Coding, and Arithmetic Coding.…”
Section: Data Compression and Database Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously described a preliminary implementation of XRAY elsewhere [Cannane and Williams 2000]. Our scheme is a three-phase approach based on the modeling, probability estimation, and coding paradigm discussed in Section 2.1.…”
Section: Xray-extended Raymentioning
confidence: 99%