2021
DOI: 10.1037/abn0000681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational account of the mechanisms underlying face perception biases in depression.

Abstract: Here, we take a computational approach to understand the mechanisms underlying face perception biases in depression. Thirty participants diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder and thirty healthy control participants took part in three studies involving recognition of identity and emotion in faces. We used signal detection theory to determine whether any perceptual biases exist in depression aside from decisional biases. We found lower sensitivity to happiness in general, and lower sensitivity to both happine… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, authors have noted the need for a better understanding of the development and nature of processing biases (Koster & Bernstein, 2015;Wells, 2019). Similar to others (e.g., Soto et al, 2021, also see Chen et al, 2015, for a review), we argue here that a prerequisite to understanding processing biases in emotional disorders is a coherent theoretical framework of information processing that can be computationally modeled and parameterized. Such a theoretical framework of information processing would enable more detailed descriptions of the interactions between negative emotional symptoms and sampling pleasant and unpleasant information, as well as the potential of characterizing emotional disorders as interpretable shifts in the model's parameters.…”
Section: Processing Biases and Emotional Disorderssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Indeed, authors have noted the need for a better understanding of the development and nature of processing biases (Koster & Bernstein, 2015;Wells, 2019). Similar to others (e.g., Soto et al, 2021, also see Chen et al, 2015, for a review), we argue here that a prerequisite to understanding processing biases in emotional disorders is a coherent theoretical framework of information processing that can be computationally modeled and parameterized. Such a theoretical framework of information processing would enable more detailed descriptions of the interactions between negative emotional symptoms and sampling pleasant and unpleasant information, as well as the potential of characterizing emotional disorders as interpretable shifts in the model's parameters.…”
Section: Processing Biases and Emotional Disorderssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The learning period was defined as data points before the point where the slope dropped below 0.001, which were discarded from the data of each participant. This method has been implemented and proved useful in multiple previous studies (e.g., Soto et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more common approach in the computational modeling literature is to perform simulations to determine at what sample sizes it is possible to recover the true model parameters that have generated a data set. Such simulations (Soto et al, 2021) suggest that a sample size of 20-30 participants per experiment is adequate for accurate parameter estimation. Therefore, 30 complete datasets were collected for each group.…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 96%
“…After exclusion of uninformative data sets (see below), we obtained between 20 and 30 participants in each experiment. Simulation work has shown that these sample sizes provide high parameter recoverability for the model used in our analyses (Soto et al, 2021). Participation was voluntary and compensated with course credit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%