2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0218196719500681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational approach to the Frobenius–Schur indicators of finite exceptional groups

Abstract: We prove that the finite exceptional groups F 4 (q), E 7 (q) ad , and E 8 (q) have no irreducible complex characters with Frobenius-Schur indicator −1, and we list exactly which irreducible characters of these groups are not real-valued. We also give an exact list of complex irreducible characters of the Ree groups 2 F 4 (q 2 ) which are not real-valued, and we show the only character of this group which has Frobenius-Schur indicator −1 is the cuspidal unipotent character χ 21 found by M. Geck.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main issue for general types is that the relationship between Frobenius-Schur indicators and the Lusztig-Jordan decomposition is not well-understood, cf. [TV20] for some results in this direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The main issue for general types is that the relationship between Frobenius-Schur indicators and the Lusztig-Jordan decomposition is not well-understood, cf. [TV20] for some results in this direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A new interpretation of the F-S indicator in terms of superalgebras has been given recently in [13]. The case of the dihedral group D 8 shows that ǫ(χ) is not determined by the character table of G. The computation of F-S indicators can be a surprisingly difficult task, which has not been fully completed for the simple groups of Lie type, for instance (see [25]). Problem 14 on Brauer's famous list [2] asks for a group-theoretical interpretation of the number of χ ∈ Irr(G) with ǫ(χ) = 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For , this is proved in [LRV20]. The main issue for general types is that the relationship between Frobenius–Schur indicators and the Lusztig–Jordan decomposition is not well understood; see [TV20] for some results in this direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%