9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-5446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computational Design Engine for Multi-Disciplinary Optimisation with Application to a Blended Wing Body Configuration

Abstract: A "Computational Design Engine" for multidisciplinary design and optimisation of aeronautical products, specially tailored to the need s of a multi-model, multi-level, multi-site environment, is described. The system is illustrated with an application to the Breguet range optimisation of a Blended Wing Body configuration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis compares the longitudinal center of gravity (cg) location with the longitudinal control capability of the aircraft through elevons (conventional design) or the thrust vectoring system (distributed propulsion design) based on two assessment criteria. These criteria draw in part on those used by the European MOB project [30]. The two criteria are evaluated at the approach flight phase.…”
Section: Stability and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis compares the longitudinal center of gravity (cg) location with the longitudinal control capability of the aircraft through elevons (conventional design) or the thrust vectoring system (distributed propulsion design) based on two assessment criteria. These criteria draw in part on those used by the European MOB project [30]. The two criteria are evaluated at the approach flight phase.…”
Section: Stability and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At date, the cloud of points approach has successfully been used to define simple flat-panel discretization models for aeroelastic analysis [32], to provide the mesh seeds for highfidelity analysis grids [33], and panels definition for VSAERO [24] and another similar in-house developed panel code [34]. The cloud of points has also been used to support the automatic re-splining of the aircraft surfaces into the NLR proprietary CFD system ENFLOW [23].…”
Section: Cms For Aerodynamic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…no gaps between movable and wing surface), but has proved adequate to compute aerodynamic loads and derivatives, both using simple panel codes, such as VSAERO, and higher fidelity aerodynamic tools, such as ENFLOW, the NLR proprietary CFD simulation tool [23]. In fact, when the goal is not computing the flow through the wing/movable gap or around the cut off area of the movable, but to obtain a reasonable estimation of the overall pressure distribution, it is a common practice to model lifting surfaces with deflected movables just as continuous surfaces.…”
Section: Definition Of the Aircraft Movablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method was studied by many scholars, such as Droegkamp [12], Bindolino [13], Laban [14], Hurlimann [15], and Sensmeier [16]. Such methods are generally based on finite element analysis to size the various components of the primary structure and compute their weight with material density and volume information [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%