2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational framework for G/XFEM material nonlinear analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(24). In Gupta [40], the solution (25) = 10 8 ⋅ E ⋅ J convergence and growth rate of the condition number are investigated for an h-refinement performed for both global and local meshes. Here, the mesh is kept constant and only the number of nodes enriched with the local solution in the global scale is considered.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(24). In Gupta [40], the solution (25) = 10 8 ⋅ E ⋅ J convergence and growth rate of the condition number are investigated for an h-refinement performed for both global and local meshes. Here, the mesh is kept constant and only the number of nodes enriched with the local solution in the global scale is considered.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combinations of polynomials, discontinuous and singular functions were initially used as enrichment in two-dimensional [6] and three-dimensional linear elastic problems [4]. Later, nonlinear problems were also considered in [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system has been expanded by Alves et al [14] with the enclosing the standard version of GFEM formulation with minimum impact in the code structure. Based on this expansion an object oriented design of GFEM to physically nonlinear analysis has been extended by Monteiro et al [15], being used in all simulations of this paper. Further details about the INSANE system can be found in INSANE Project [16].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results obtained by the author were used by Monteiro at al. [15] and extended here to compare with the numerical results of the simulations performed with GFEM and FEM approaches.…”
Section: Three-point Bendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these models is the smeared crack method, which relate the tangent of the softening curve to the finite element size Oliver [11], Rots [12], and Bazant [13]. An alternative powerful method is the Partition of Unity Finite Element Method (PUFEM) Melenk and Babuska [14], which developed in the last decade in the form of the mesh free methods Rabczuk [15], or the Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) Unger [16] and Monteiro [17]. Huang [18] used three point loading test for mortar specimen with different thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%