DOI: 10.17077/etd.qmxgsc4j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational investigation of patient factors contributing to contact stress abnormalities in the dysplastic hip joint

Abstract: Theses and DissertationsFall 2017 A computational investigation of patient factors contributing to A computational investigation of patient factors contributing to contact stress abnormalities in the dysplastic hip joint contact stress abnormalities in the dysplastic hip joint ABSTRACT Acetabular dysplasia, a deformity characterized by the presence of a shallow acetabulum inadequately covering the femoral head, alters force transfer through a joint, causing early-onset hip pain and degeneration. Dysplasia is o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 92 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison among three different segmenters (HDT-A, MA, KS) over 3 nonconsecutive days resulted in a median absolute difference of 0.8 MPa (range, 0-2.1 MPa) in the computed peak contact stress and 0.1 MPa (range, 0-0.2 MPa) in the computed mean contact stress. Variation in segmentation by the same segmenter over 3 nonconsecutive days resulted in a median absolute difference of 1.2 MPa (range, 0.3-2.1 MPa) in the computed peak contact stress and 0.1 MPa (range, 0-0.2 MPa) in the computed mean contact stress [40]. These results indicate a minimal effect of manual segmentation on the resulting contact stress calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Comparison among three different segmenters (HDT-A, MA, KS) over 3 nonconsecutive days resulted in a median absolute difference of 0.8 MPa (range, 0-2.1 MPa) in the computed peak contact stress and 0.1 MPa (range, 0-0.2 MPa) in the computed mean contact stress. Variation in segmentation by the same segmenter over 3 nonconsecutive days resulted in a median absolute difference of 1.2 MPa (range, 0.3-2.1 MPa) in the computed peak contact stress and 0.1 MPa (range, 0-0.2 MPa) in the computed mean contact stress [40]. These results indicate a minimal effect of manual segmentation on the resulting contact stress calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%