2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.02.121129
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational method for immune repertoire mining that identifies novel binders from different clonotypes, demonstrated by identifying anti-Pertussis toxoid antibodies

Abstract: Due to their shared genetic history, antibodies from the same clonotype often bind to the same epitope. This knowledge is used in immune repertoire mining, where known binders are used to search bulk sequencing repertoires to identify new binders. However current computational methods cannot identify epitope convergence between antibodies from different clonotypes, limiting the sequence diversity of antigen-specific antibodies which can be identified. We describe how the antibody binding site, the paratope, ca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows how Repertoire Structural Profiling could be used in conjunction with clonotyping to add geometric support to convergent clones being functionally equivalent. Recently published methods that can predict paratope similarity across all six CDRs [ 22 , 38 ] may be able to find considerably more antibodies within each distinct structure cluster with similar enough interaction profiles to be functionally equivalent. To facilitate future investigations into this area, we supply the Fv sequences across all ten individuals assigned to each ‘Public Baseline’ distinct structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This shows how Repertoire Structural Profiling could be used in conjunction with clonotyping to add geometric support to convergent clones being functionally equivalent. Recently published methods that can predict paratope similarity across all six CDRs [ 22 , 38 ] may be able to find considerably more antibodies within each distinct structure cluster with similar enough interaction profiles to be functionally equivalent. To facilitate future investigations into this area, we supply the Fv sequences across all ten individuals assigned to each ‘Public Baseline’ distinct structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because it assumes that antibodies require a similar genetic background and high CDRH3 sequence identity to achieve complementarity to the same epitope. In reality, similar binding site structures and paratopes can be achieved from different genetic origins [ 21 , 22 ] and with surprisingly low CDRH3 sequence identity [ 23 ] (conversely, false positives can arise where antibodies with high CDRH3 sequence identity and the same genetic origins adopt markedly different binding site topologies [ 23 ]). It is also the case that not every epitope is naturally suited to CDRH3-dominated binding, instead preferring broader engagement by multiple CDRs [ 24 ], putting less selection pressure on CDRH3 sequence identity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very recent paper uses a microfluidics-based approach to experimentally evaluate antibody specificity in high throughput [ 43 ] (of particular relevance to our results, they find no correlation between and measured affinity). Another recent paper clusters sequences into specificity groups using amino acid hamming distance on a subset of CDR residues deemed likely to contribute to binding [ 44 ]. These paratope residues are chosen using a deep learning approach trained on a large database of existing structural data [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very recent paper uses a microfluidics-based approach to experimentally evaluate antibody specificity in high throughput [43] (of particular relevance to our results, they find no correlation between n-shm and measured affinity). Another recent paper clusters sequences into specificity groups using amino acid hamming distance on a subset of CDR residues deemed likely to contribute to binding [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%