2017
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201706376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computational Method for Unveiling the Target Promiscuity of Pharmacologically Active Compounds

Abstract: Drug discovery is governed by the desire to find ligands with defined modes of action. It has been realized that even designated selective drugs may have more macromolecular targets than is commonly thought. Consequently, it will be mandatory to consider multitarget activity for the design of future medicines. Computational models assist medicinal chemists in this effort by helping to eliminate unsuitable lead structures and spot undesired drug effects early in the discovery process. Here, we present a straigh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Software. Software for molecular descriptor calculation (CATS), [8] self-organizing map training and analysis (POOMA), [19] target prediction (TIGER), [20] and similarity searching (inSili.com LLC, Zurich, Switzerland) was run on an iMac workstation. Parameter settings: CATS: feature correlation over 0-9 bonds, with type scaling; POOMA: 20 × 10 toroidal map, Gaussian neighborhood, random initialization, linear decay of the learning rate (τ initial = 1), 10 9 learning cycles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software. Software for molecular descriptor calculation (CATS), [8] self-organizing map training and analysis (POOMA), [19] target prediction (TIGER), [20] and similarity searching (inSili.com LLC, Zurich, Switzerland) was run on an iMac workstation. Parameter settings: CATS: feature correlation over 0-9 bonds, with type scaling; POOMA: 20 × 10 toroidal map, Gaussian neighborhood, random initialization, linear decay of the learning rate (τ initial = 1), 10 9 learning cycles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the algorithm considers all compounds of the winning SOM cluster (Voronoi field) as relevant for similarity assessment, and computes two scores for the query compound. The log( Odds ) score estimates the information content of a taget prediction, and the AUC score considers the confidence of a prediction by weighting the drugs from the immediate vicinity of the query higher than the more distant drugs within the SOM cluster . This scoring process is performed for each of the two SOMs, and the final TIGER score is calculated as the averaged product of the individual scores.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…LBVS also forms the basis for target prediction tools, which assign possible targets to a molecule based on its similarity to known, target annotated molecules such as those in the ChEMBL database. 2 Targets are assigned either directly based on nearest neighbor (NN) relationships, or indirectly by building a machine learning (ML) model, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] with several tools available online. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Herein we report PPB2 (Polypharmacology Browser version 2) as an extension of our previously reported web-portal PPB (Polypharmacology Browser).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%