2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2015.7351550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational model for predicting local distortion visibility via convolutional neural network trainedon natural scenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the inference step does not require the knowledge of the error, and can produce an estimate of local masking for any input image. Interestingly (and perhaps surprisingly), we find that perceptual scaling learned from image quality scores can predict the detection thresholds in [9] with similar accuracy as the CNN-based regressor in [10], although our model is learned on other datasets with different contents and several kinds of visual impairements. This makes the proposed approach potentially more general than previous work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the inference step does not require the knowledge of the error, and can produce an estimate of local masking for any input image. Interestingly (and perhaps surprisingly), we find that perceptual scaling learned from image quality scores can predict the detection thresholds in [9] with similar accuracy as the CNN-based regressor in [10], although our model is learned on other datasets with different contents and several kinds of visual impairements. This makes the proposed approach potentially more general than previous work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We observe that these points correspond indeed to the outliers in the scatter plot. By removing these few very dark or very bright patches (28 patches out of 1080), we ob- 6.521 Teo & Heeger [22] 6.861 Chandler et al [1] 6.879 Optimized GC [10] 5.192 Alam et al CNN [10] 5.475…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, these earlier models were limited by the available computational power at their time, which required them to tailor their models to the processed stimuli or to limit the possible computations, for example, to entirely local normalization. Recently some more models were implemented to work on images (e.g., Alam, Patil, Hagan, & Chandler, 2015;Bradley, Abrams, & Geisler, 2014). These models usually do not cover the whole complexity, but simplify the normalization steps to reach a computationally more efficient model (Bradley et al, 2014) or are based on entirely different approaches like neural networks trained to predict the detectability of specific distortions (Alam et al, 2015).…”
Section: History and Classical Experiments In Spatial Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%