2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-016-0307-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational platform for considering the effects of aerodynamic and seismic load combination for utility scale horizontal axis wind turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This guideline suggests that the earthquake and wind loads should be accounted with a factor equal to 0.75. The earthquake loads approximately are represented with a correction factor equal to 1.4 applied to the numerical results of parked condition . The earthquake load demands suggested by GL and AWEA/ASCE are presented in Equations and , respectively: MGL=MParked+MAero MAWEA/ASCE=0.75()1.4MParked+MAero where M Parked is the tower bending moment demand calculated for parked condition with earthquake excitation and M Aero is the tower bending moment demand evaluated with FAST for turbulent wind field (Figure ) without taking into consideration earthquake loads.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This guideline suggests that the earthquake and wind loads should be accounted with a factor equal to 0.75. The earthquake loads approximately are represented with a correction factor equal to 1.4 applied to the numerical results of parked condition . The earthquake load demands suggested by GL and AWEA/ASCE are presented in Equations and , respectively: MGL=MParked+MAero MAWEA/ASCE=0.75()1.4MParked+MAero where M Parked is the tower bending moment demand calculated for parked condition with earthquake excitation and M Aero is the tower bending moment demand evaluated with FAST for turbulent wind field (Figure ) without taking into consideration earthquake loads.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A numerical tool capable for the simulation of the seismic behavior of wind turbines is presented in the literature and is based on FAST tool . The 3 translational degrees of freedom of the foundation were replaced by a linear oscillator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the results of the three typical operating scenarios (operational, parked and emergency shutdown), a fragility analysis was performed. Meanwhile, Asareh and Prowell developed a numerical analysis tool named Seismic, for the conduct of seismic analysis of wind turbines using FAST [28][29][30]. In this Seismic tool, a damped actuator was located at the base of the tower in order to replace the degree of freedom (DOF) in translational direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation of the coupled OWT foundation models with nonlinear SSI has been noted as major shortcomings of the existing numerical tools [28][29][30]. Therefore, this tool (SAF) makes it possible for the dynamic behaviour of an OWT with flexible or fixed foundations subjected to seismic loadings to be adequately simulated by including the SSI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 It is important to note that the nature of the ground in which the WT foundation is placed has a substantial influence on the propagation/attenuation of vibrations from the WT and also in dictating the WT response to aerodynamic loads. 41 For example, soil-…”
Section: Ground Vibrations Induced By Wtsmentioning
confidence: 99%