40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting &Amp; Exhibit 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-1022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational study of unsteady ship airwake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reality level of RANS for the airwake determination is regarded as acceptable. In addition, another numerical study for the airwake of LHA ship model has been carried out by Polsky and Bruner (2001), using both the RANS (using SST k -ω turbulence model) and Monotone Integrated Large Eddy Simulation (MILES) methods. The result also indicates that the URANS is capable of capturing the unsteady flowfield characteristics.…”
Section: Cfd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reality level of RANS for the airwake determination is regarded as acceptable. In addition, another numerical study for the airwake of LHA ship model has been carried out by Polsky and Bruner (2001), using both the RANS (using SST k -ω turbulence model) and Monotone Integrated Large Eddy Simulation (MILES) methods. The result also indicates that the URANS is capable of capturing the unsteady flowfield characteristics.…”
Section: Cfd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16,17,18 Solutions often use time-accurate calculations and agree with wind tunnel and flight test data fairly well. In one case 19 the CFD solution is used with a flight simulator enabling a pilot to fly through the airwake.…”
Section: Airwake Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Airwake datasets for seven WOD azimuths were computed: 000, 030, 045, 060, 090, 180 and 330 degrees. Six WOD speeds were considered: 15,20,25,30,35, and 45 knots. All cases, with the exception of 000, were run using a steady atmospheric boundary layer profile applied as an inflow boundary condition.…”
Section: Cfd Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%