2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computational Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Assessment Method Comparable with Visual Reporting Guidelines for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Abstract: Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are clinically significant in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Although a standardized methodology for visual TILs assessment (VTA) exists, it has several inherent limitations. We established a deep learning-based computational TIL assessment (CTA) method broadly following VTA guideline and compared it with VTA for TNBC to determine the prognostic value of the CTA and a reasonable CTA workflow for clinical practice. Methods: We trained three deep neural ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to investigate the applicability of the assay for quantitative measurements, we first used automatic, software-based positive cell counting on slides that were digitalized in a slide scanner instrument. Computational cell counting is widely used in human pathology, especially for Ki67 index and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte assessments, and it is proved to be comparable to or, in some cases, even more accurate and reproducible than manual counting [ 26 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate the applicability of the assay for quantitative measurements, we first used automatic, software-based positive cell counting on slides that were digitalized in a slide scanner instrument. Computational cell counting is widely used in human pathology, especially for Ki67 index and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte assessments, and it is proved to be comparable to or, in some cases, even more accurate and reproducible than manual counting [ 26 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TNBC 3-gene score was evaluated as continuous variable while TIL count was categorized into high and low, using a cutoff value of 20% since it has been proved as a prognostic biomarker of survival in TNBC [ 18 , 27 , 28 ]. The boxplot graphic and the Student’s t-test were used to analyze the differences between groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anticipating the influx of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms (AI/ML) to assess TILs [17][18][19][20][21][22], we began the High Throughput Truthing (HTT) project in collaboration with an international team of pathologists, clinical scientists, and leadership from the Working Group [23]. Our goal is to create a dataset of digital slide data with pathologist annotations for the validation of computational pathology models (e.g., AI/ML) for stromal TILs (sTILs) assessment that will be fit for a regulatory purpose as a medical device development tool [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%