2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.07.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computationally efficient 3D/2D registration method based on image gradient direction probability density function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the second stage of the method proposed, where after having calculated the features vector (FV M ,l ) for each one of 1,300 images (N ) of the ten different classes (M ), we proceed to calculate the features vector for each particular class (V µ F M ). Considering that there are 16 spectral indicators or predictors (W ) for each image, therefore also V µ F M will have 16 spectral indicators that will define each class based on a specific probability density function (pdf ) for each spectral indicator and class, i.e., pdf (F M (i)) [31]- [33], as (4) shows:…”
Section: Determination Of General Correlation Vector For Each Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows the second stage of the method proposed, where after having calculated the features vector (FV M ,l ) for each one of 1,300 images (N ) of the ten different classes (M ), we proceed to calculate the features vector for each particular class (V µ F M ). Considering that there are 16 spectral indicators or predictors (W ) for each image, therefore also V µ F M will have 16 spectral indicators that will define each class based on a specific probability density function (pdf ) for each spectral indicator and class, i.e., pdf (F M (i)) [31]- [33], as (4) shows:…”
Section: Determination Of General Correlation Vector For Each Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, only one 2D image may be enough to achieve 2D/3D registration in the projection and back-projection strategy. However, the reconstruction method requires at least two or more 2D images to reconstruct 3D images with high enough accuracy to achieve accurate and robust 3D/3D registration for high-resolution 3D images collected before surgery [4,25,26]. In general, the greater the number of intraoperative 2D images, the higher the registration accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high complexity of projection space dramatically affects the timeliness of registration. Ghafurian et al [30] considered that the 2D/3D registration problem needs to search the complex solution space, leading to many calculations, so they proposed a spatial parameter-decoupling method to achieve registration. According to the dimensional differences between the registration images, image registration can be divided into 2D/2D registration, 2D/3D registration, 3D/3D registration, and time-series registration [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%