2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2014.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computed tomography evaluation of two hundred normal ankles, to ascertain what anatomical landmarks to use when compressing or placing an ankle syndesmosis screw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have reported malreduction rates ranging from 16% to 52% of patients. 1013 Off-axis clamping and screw trajectory, 1416 along with difficult intra-operative radiographic reduction assessment, are commonly cited factors for such high malreduction rates. 3,17,18 The use of computed tomography (CT) scanning has been validated as a more reproducible and sensitive means of assessing the accuracy of syndesmotic reductions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have reported malreduction rates ranging from 16% to 52% of patients. 1013 Off-axis clamping and screw trajectory, 1416 along with difficult intra-operative radiographic reduction assessment, are commonly cited factors for such high malreduction rates. 3,17,18 The use of computed tomography (CT) scanning has been validated as a more reproducible and sensitive means of assessing the accuracy of syndesmotic reductions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is crucial given prior studies that emphasize the importance of anatomic syndesmotic reduction. Classically, syndesmotic screws are placed at 30 degrees from the coronal plane [11, 30]. In this study, we determined the anatomic TSA in 45 uninjured adult ankles and found that the average syndesmotic angle was less than this historically accepted value, averaging 21±5 degrees anterior to the plane of a lateral radiograph.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In a study by Lepojarvi et al [12], 97% of the fibulas were positioned anteriorly or centrally. As such, any reduction vector that is not collinear with the true axis of the syndesmosis has the potential to malreduce the fibula within the incisura [11, 12, 16, 18, 20]. Coronal and sagittal alignment is readily measured on plain radiographs, and coronal malalignment has been the most frequently cited and measured in previous studies [16, 18, 20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…149 This position corresponds to a line from the lateral cortical apex of the fibula to the anterior half of the medial malleolus. 150 Aberrant screw placement may cause malreduction. 100 Furthermore, the screw should be inserted parallel to the ankle joint in the coronal plane to prevent any proximal migration.…”
Section: Implant Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%