1972
DOI: 10.1109/tct.1972.1083500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computer algorithm to determine the steady-state response of nonlinear oscillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
81
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Average models fall within this type of systems, but they have evident limitations to evaluate adverse effect of the harmonic distortion on the performance of the MG. Alternatively, the harmonic domain modeling approach is able to consider the distorted nature of microgrids and also leads to time-invariant representations; however, the proper modeling of closed-loop controls and nonlinearities are still a bottleneck in this domain [20]. In order to deal with these problems, the fast time-domain methods were proposed [21], [22] and based on these seminal papers, other methods have been proposed and some of them will be presented in the following sections. Depending on the kind of system, these techniques are referred as shooting methods, Poincaré map methods or simply Newton methods [15]; in particular for non-autonomous systems, the shooting and the Poincaré map methods are essentially the same.…”
Section: On the Computation Of The Periodic Steady State Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average models fall within this type of systems, but they have evident limitations to evaluate adverse effect of the harmonic distortion on the performance of the MG. Alternatively, the harmonic domain modeling approach is able to consider the distorted nature of microgrids and also leads to time-invariant representations; however, the proper modeling of closed-loop controls and nonlinearities are still a bottleneck in this domain [20]. In order to deal with these problems, the fast time-domain methods were proposed [21], [22] and based on these seminal papers, other methods have been proposed and some of them will be presented in the following sections. Depending on the kind of system, these techniques are referred as shooting methods, Poincaré map methods or simply Newton methods [15]; in particular for non-autonomous systems, the shooting and the Poincaré map methods are essentially the same.…”
Section: On the Computation Of The Periodic Steady State Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aprille and Trick [2] fist proposed an approach to eliminate the additional unknown when applying the Newton-Raphson shooting method to analyze oscillators. This method was subsequently implemented in SSPICE [3].…”
Section: Steady-state Analysis Of Oscillators Using Homotopy Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the periodic steady-state circuit response is simulated directly using either the time-domain NewtonRaphson shooting method, or the frequency-domain harmonic-balance method [7]. The time-domain NewtonRaphson shooting method is preferred for simulating highly nonlinear circuits [2,3,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is easy to implement since the mapping between the two time axes has already been obtained in Eq. (2). As shown in Eq.…”
Section: (U(t)) and I(u(t))mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example [1] provides a method to find the steadystate of high-Q oscillators using the transient analysis in Spice. In [2], a Newton algorithm is used to find the periodic response and the period of oscillators quickly in lightly damped systems. However, the complete transient solution is still not accessible in these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%