Abstract:This study was aimed at assessing a new computer‐based system to promote task performance in three adults with severe developmental disabilities. The new system, which was small and battery powered, could provide auditory and vibratory prompts in addition to pictorial instructions concerning the task steps. To control for the effects of the computer‐based system, the subjects were also exposed to a card system. The results showed that the subjects had a significantly higher level of correct performance on the … Show more
“…The first study (Lancioni et al, 1998) had two main goals: (a) comparing the effectiveness of the VICAID system with that of a conventional card system for establishing task performance in three participants with severe developmental disabilities and (b) checking the participants' preference between the two systems. The first version of the VICAID system (with a palmtop computer with a black and white screen) was used.…”
Section: Study Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the VICAID system has been carried out in five studies Lancioni, O'Reilly, Seedhouse, Furniss, and Cunha, 2000;Lancioni, Van den Hof, Boelens, Rocha and Seedhouse, 1998;Lancioni, Van den Hof, Furniss, O'Reilly and Cunha, 1999).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Vicaid Systemmentioning
The development of technologies to assist people with severe and profound developmental disabilities to engage in constructive activity without constant support from carers may assist such persons to participate fully in vocational and other occupational activities. We describe the development, evaluation and use of VICAID, a system based on a radically simplified palmtop computer. The VICAID system enables a person with a developmental disability to access pictorial instructions designed to help him or her in the accurate completion of tasks. It also provides reminders to access the instructions, and/or alerts a job coach or supervisor should the worker's interaction with the system suggest that they are having difficulty with a task. Evaluative studies show that (1) the system is more effective than alternative supports (pictorial instructions presented in booklets) in maintaining accurate task performance, (2) that the system is preferred to such booklets by most users with severe disabilities, and (3) that it can be used in real work settings. Future development of the system will require attention to be paid to issues of training job-coaches and support workers in its setting-up and maintenance.
“…The first study (Lancioni et al, 1998) had two main goals: (a) comparing the effectiveness of the VICAID system with that of a conventional card system for establishing task performance in three participants with severe developmental disabilities and (b) checking the participants' preference between the two systems. The first version of the VICAID system (with a palmtop computer with a black and white screen) was used.…”
Section: Study Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the VICAID system has been carried out in five studies Lancioni, O'Reilly, Seedhouse, Furniss, and Cunha, 2000;Lancioni, Van den Hof, Boelens, Rocha and Seedhouse, 1998;Lancioni, Van den Hof, Furniss, O'Reilly and Cunha, 1999).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Vicaid Systemmentioning
The development of technologies to assist people with severe and profound developmental disabilities to engage in constructive activity without constant support from carers may assist such persons to participate fully in vocational and other occupational activities. We describe the development, evaluation and use of VICAID, a system based on a radically simplified palmtop computer. The VICAID system enables a person with a developmental disability to access pictorial instructions designed to help him or her in the accurate completion of tasks. It also provides reminders to access the instructions, and/or alerts a job coach or supervisor should the worker's interaction with the system suggest that they are having difficulty with a task. Evaluative studies show that (1) the system is more effective than alternative supports (pictorial instructions presented in booklets) in maintaining accurate task performance, (2) that the system is preferred to such booklets by most users with severe disabilities, and (3) that it can be used in real work settings. Future development of the system will require attention to be paid to issues of training job-coaches and support workers in its setting-up and maintenance.
“…For example, the studies relying on pictorial instructions tended to use a larger number of tasks than the studies using systematic prompting. With regard to the former studies, it may also be noted that those by Lancioni et al . (1995, 1998, 1999a,b, 2000b) included not only the 4–7 tasks on food preparation but several other (food‐unrelated) tasks too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Other studies involving participants with severe intellectual disabilities tended to select those with breaks in performance, who could pose problems in learning as well as task engagement (e.g. Lancioni et al . 1998, 2000a,b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1992; Singh et al . 1995; Johnson & Miltenberger 1996; Lancioni et al . 1998; 2000a,b; Wolery et al .…”
Background Food preparation skills are considered very relevant for people with intellectual disabilities. This paper reviewed research studies teaching these skills through the use of pictorial instructions or systematic prompting strategies.
Methods Computerized and hard searches led to the identification of: 12 studies using pictorial instructions on cards; four studies using pictorial instructions through computers; seven studies using systematic prompting (time delay or prompted practice of incorrect task steps), and three studies combining time delay with cards.
Results The overall training outcomes were quite encouraging. Maintenance and generalization data tended to be in line with the training outcomes. The findings for the different teaching approaches were analysed in relation to the characteristics of the participants, number and complexity of the tasks available, data collection strategies as well as relevant literature on intellectual disabilities. The suitability of the teaching approaches for different types of people and environments and some relevant issues for future research were also examined.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.