2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.02.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computer simulation and experimental study of the difference between krypton adsorption on a graphite surface and in a graphitic hexagonal pore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3b and c. At zero loading, the isosteric heat of 12 kJ/mol, is solely due to the interaction between krypton and graphite and is in good agreement with the calculated value (12.03 kJ/mol) from direct Monte Carlo integration [27]. As the loading in the sub-monolayer coverage region is increased, the isosteric heat increases and reaches a maximum of about 22 kJ/mol when particles in the first layer form an almost perfect hexagonal packing (Point C), consistent with observations from our previous studies [28,29]. The additional 10 kJ/mol comes from the six nearest-neighbour krypton-krypton interactions, which each contribute approximately 1.37 kJ/mol together with contributions from neighbours in more distant shells (Point C of Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…3b and c. At zero loading, the isosteric heat of 12 kJ/mol, is solely due to the interaction between krypton and graphite and is in good agreement with the calculated value (12.03 kJ/mol) from direct Monte Carlo integration [27]. As the loading in the sub-monolayer coverage region is increased, the isosteric heat increases and reaches a maximum of about 22 kJ/mol when particles in the first layer form an almost perfect hexagonal packing (Point C), consistent with observations from our previous studies [28,29]. The additional 10 kJ/mol comes from the six nearest-neighbour krypton-krypton interactions, which each contribute approximately 1.37 kJ/mol together with contributions from neighbours in more distant shells (Point C of Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Their isosteric heats are distinctly different from those for simple and non-polar adsorptive [13,23]. An outstanding feature in the plot of isosteric heat versus loading is a sharp decrease at very low loadings [9,20]. This phenomenon was later explained by Horikawa et al [24]; the high heat at zero loading (greater than the heat of liquefaction) is a consequence of strong interaction between the adsorbates and functional groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Physical adsorption of polar fluids on graphitized thermal carbon black (GTCB) has been widely studied experimentally and theoretically [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] because an improved understanding of the interaction between the adsorbate and a graphitic surface is a fundamental step towards better design of adsorbers that use porous carbons [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations below the triple point have provided better insight into these various 2D transitions at the molecular level [17,18,[27][28][29][30][31]. However, little attention has been paid to the origin of the experimentally observed hysteresis associated with the 2D transition [26,32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%