2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computerized method (UPPREC) for quantitative analysis of irradiated nuclear fuel assemblies with gamma emission tomography at the Halden reactor

Abstract: A computerized method (UPPREC) for quantitative analysis of irradiated nuclear fuel assemblies with gamma emission tomography at the Halden reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, experimental measurements of the power distribution obtained from a specific fuel assembly near the flux trap are used to validate the results obtained from the model. In this study, the power distribution is inferred from the gamma emission intensity of the fission products along the FA [36][37][38][39]. The underlying concept of the experimental measurements is based on the proportionality between the fission power density experienced by the fuel and the concentration of fission products in it.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, experimental measurements of the power distribution obtained from a specific fuel assembly near the flux trap are used to validate the results obtained from the model. In this study, the power distribution is inferred from the gamma emission intensity of the fission products along the FA [36][37][38][39]. The underlying concept of the experimental measurements is based on the proportionality between the fission power density experienced by the fuel and the concentration of fission products in it.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that from the simulated spectra one just obtains the probability of full-energy deposition per source particle, therefore, to get the total counts at each position we have multiplied the projection data by a factor such that at the central scan position approximately 1000 counts should be obtained after the multiplication. It was assumed that a minimum of 1000 counts (based on a previous tomographic reconstruction experience of nuclear fuel object [17]) at this position would be required to have a satisfactory reconstruction, also assuming the counts as Poisson distributed, this would result in uncertainty of ± 3%. This was done for all reconstruction cases.…”
Section: Test Object Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For accurate analysis of the source activity using gamma spectrometry, the self-attenuation needs to be accounted for when calculating the source activity from the measured peak intensity. In the case of tomography, it equivalently needs to be accounted for in the calculation of the system matrix (16). One method for this purpose is the analytical correction according to Eq.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%