2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.finmar.2011.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computing bias in estimating the probability of informed trading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both issues have been identified and analyzed in the literature, the former by William Lin and Ke (2011) and the latter by Yan and Zhang (2012). We therefore report convergence rates and check all model parameters for their distribution and occurrence of boundary solutions.…”
Section: Robustness Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both issues have been identified and analyzed in the literature, the former by William Lin and Ke (2011) and the latter by Yan and Zhang (2012). We therefore report convergence rates and check all model parameters for their distribution and occurrence of boundary solutions.…”
Section: Robustness Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likelihood factorization presented in Equation (1) (EKOP factorization) is prone to selection bias. Lin and Ke (2011) show that the feasible solution set for the non-linear optimization problem shrinks significantly as the daily number of buy and sell orders increases. The optimal value for the log-likelihood in Equation (2) becomes undefined, for large enough ðB t ; S t Þ whose factorials cannot be computed by mainstream computers (floating-point exception (FPE)).…”
Section: Floating-point Exception and Different Likelihood Factorizatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first factorization (EHO factorization) is provided by Easley, Hvidkjaer, and O'Hara (2010). The other (LK factorization) is provided by Lin and Ke (2011). Both studies modify the factorization such that B t !…”
Section: Floating-point Exception and Different Likelihood Factorizatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floating-Point Exception PIN estimates are prone to selection bias, especially for stocks for which the number of buy and sell orders are large 3 . Lin and Ke (2011) show that the increase in the number of buy and sell orders for a given stock, significantly shrinks the feasible solution set for the maximization of the log likelihood function in equation 2. To maximize the non-linear function (1), the optimization software introduces initial values for the parameters in Θ.…”
Section: Pin Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Easley et al (2010) indicate that for stocks with a large trading volume, it is not possible to estimate PIN due to floating-point-exception (FPE). Two different numerical factorizations are provided by Easley et al (2010) and Lin and Ke (2011) to overcome the bias created due to FPE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%