2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021209622648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Concentration pdf for the Relative Dispersion of a Contaminant Plume in the Atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11b)]. As expected, the former type is the most probable in the plume centerline, as shown by Munro et al (2003a), because the relative concentration in the mean plume position is very often different than zero. On the contrary, far from the centerline small concentrations are more probable, and consequently the PDF shows an exponential shape.…”
Section: ) Pdf Of Relative Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11b)]. As expected, the former type is the most probable in the plume centerline, as shown by Munro et al (2003a), because the relative concentration in the mean plume position is very often different than zero. On the contrary, far from the centerline small concentrations are more probable, and consequently the PDF shows an exponential shape.…”
Section: ) Pdf Of Relative Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…To distinguish and quantify the different contributions of large-scale (meandering) and small-scale motion (relative diffusion) to the evolution of a dispersing plume, it is useful to calculate second-and third-order moments in two different coordinate systems (e.g., Munro et al 2003b). By analyzing dispersion in an absolute framework, that is, in a coordinate system relative to a fixed point (e.g., the source location), the statistical properties are influenced by the full spectrum of turbulent eddies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information of the absolute concentration requires an independent calibration, which is not available from aerosol backscatter alone. The raw data from the present experiment can be compared to, for instance, those by Mylne and Mason (1991), Zimmerman and Chatwin (1995) and Munro et al (2003a). The line-of-sight averaging over the effective 1.5 m spatial extent of the Lidar pulse results here in less spiky signals in comparison.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If we turn away from our objective of naturally occurring scalars over large area sources, and towards contaminant plumes from point sources, we find that the use of third-order and higher-order moments and the assumption of bounded PDFs is more common (Yee et al 2006;Chatwin et al 1995;Munro et al 2003;Schopflocher et al 2007). This may be attributed to two causes: first, it is crucial in the estimation of exceedance probabilities, e.g.…”
Section: State Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…by superposition of several weighted unimodal distributions to a composite (e.g., Effelsberg and Peters 1983;Munro et al 2003;Wendland et al 2005). Overall, however, the beta distribution reliably allows a fairly qualified quick view of the general PDF shape based on the first four moments only.…”
Section: Relation Of Sample Higher Order Moments To Sample Extremamentioning
confidence: 99%