2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata.2018.8622216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Concept-Drift Based Predictive-Analytics Framework: Application for Real-Time Solar Irradiance Forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On days where there is no cloud cover, both models performed exceptionally; however, on days with cloud cover, both models fail to accurately predict future solar irradiance. Rather than having one static model to predict non-cloudy and cloudy days, we could potentially use ensemble methods or concept drift methods to reduce over-fitting on days where there is high variability in cloud cover [34]. Moreover, more research is needed in not only reducing the forecast error, but also maximizing the utility of irradiance forecasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On days where there is no cloud cover, both models performed exceptionally; however, on days with cloud cover, both models fail to accurately predict future solar irradiance. Rather than having one static model to predict non-cloudy and cloudy days, we could potentially use ensemble methods or concept drift methods to reduce over-fitting on days where there is high variability in cloud cover [34]. Moreover, more research is needed in not only reducing the forecast error, but also maximizing the utility of irradiance forecasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having a reliable forecast of solar irradiance (SIr) is of great importance, due to its effect on the design of photovoltaic systems and measuring solar energy production [90,91]. Figure 1 shows solar radiation on a photovoltaic module installed on the earth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also concluded that GRU is less resource-intensive and faster compared to LSTM. The proposed work builds on our prior work [28], where we analyzed the performance of LSTM and GRU for GHI forecasting with and without using exogenous variables for one hour ahead forecasting [29]. Our observation in our prior work is that including weather variables particularly cloud cover significantly improved forecasting performance for both LSTM and GRU compared to univariate models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%