1989
DOI: 10.2307/1911055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Concept of Egalitarianism Under Participation Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
340
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(345 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
340
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key restriction on prices is that for any two nodes to which the same agent is attached, the price on the winning node is not smaller than that on the losing node. 3 Surprisingly, the (welfarewise) intersection of sequential and cross-monotonic mechanisms is almost empty. It contains only the fixed cost mechanisms (Corollary 1), offering to each agent a price completely independent of the reports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key restriction on prices is that for any two nodes to which the same agent is attached, the price on the winning node is not smaller than that on the losing node. 3 Surprisingly, the (welfarewise) intersection of sequential and cross-monotonic mechanisms is almost empty. It contains only the fixed cost mechanisms (Corollary 1), offering to each agent a price completely independent of the reports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Egalitarian mechanisms [2] were inspired by an algorithmic idea for egalitarian allocations in convex cooperative games originally proposed by Dutta and Ray [8]. Roughly speaking, at every iteration, an egalitarian mechanism finds the most "cost efficient" subset of players that have not yet been assigned a price, and assigns each of these players their collective average marginal cost as its price.…”
Section: Cost Sharing Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equal split-off set [3] of a subadditive cooperative game (N, c) is the set of all cost allocations that can be computed by the following algorithm, again, inspired by the algorithm of Dutta and Ray [8]. (Note that Branzei et al [3] define the equal split-off set for superadditive reward cooperative games.…”
Section: Lemma 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calvo and Santos [6] researched a value for multichoice games by restricting the Aumann-Shapley value for continuum games in framework of multichoice games. Peters and Zank [7] proposed the egalitarian solution for multichoice games with each player having the same number of activity levels, which is an extension of the egalitarian solution proposed by Dutta and Ray [8] for traditional games. Recently, Hwang and Liao [9] investigated the weighted associated consistent value, and characterized it by means of the weighted balanced contributions and the associated consistency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%