1997
DOI: 10.1006/aphy.1997.5699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Conceptual Analysis of Quantum Zeno; Paradox, Measurement, and Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
156
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(153 reference statements)
3
156
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out by Home and Whitaker "there should be a desire to understand more about the collapse postulate, why it often works well, its limitations, and how it should be eventually adapted or replaced." [6]. In this context a natural question is: is it possible to conceive processes leading to detectable differences associated to the reduction of the wave function with different time scales?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out by Home and Whitaker "there should be a desire to understand more about the collapse postulate, why it often works well, its limitations, and how it should be eventually adapted or replaced." [6]. In this context a natural question is: is it possible to conceive processes leading to detectable differences associated to the reduction of the wave function with different time scales?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental demonstrations of the QZE [2,3,4,5,6,7,8] have been driven by interest in both fundamental physics and practical applications. Practical applications of the QZE include reducing decoherence in quantum computing [8,9,10], efficient preservation of spin polarized gases [3,4,6], and dosage reduction in neutron tomography [11].The QZE is a paradigm and test bed for quantum measurement theory [12,13]. In one interpretation, it involves many sequential collapses of the wavefunctions of the system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only way to analyse continuous measurements via the Postulate would be to treat them as the limiting case of increasingly frequent projective measurements. But the quantum Zeno effect ( [11]; see [10] for discussion) tells us that the result of any such limiting-case measurement is to freeze the system's evolution altogether, in flat contradiction of what we actually observe in continuous measurements. (This was the original reason that Misra and Sudarshan, who did analyse continuous measurement in exactly this way, called the quantum Zeno effect a 'paradox'.…”
Section: The Myth Of the 'Conventional Interpretation'mentioning
confidence: 82%