“…Various studies on feed spacers have focused on the spacer shape [ 19 , 20 ]. Previous studies employed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to investigate the effect of spacer shapes, including nonwoven, woven, middle layer, and fully woven spacers [ 21 ]; 30°, 45°, 62°, and 90° spacer filaments [ 22 ]; hairy spacers [ 23 ]; saw-tooth spacers [ 24 ]; zigzag spacers [ 25 ]; multi-layer spacers [ 26 ]; and sinusoidal spacers [ 27 ], on the membrane performance. In addition, with the boost of 3D printing, the design of spacers was affected [ 28 , 29 ], i.e., column-type spacers [ 30 ], triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) spacers [ 31 ], symmetric perforated spacers (1-Hole, 2-Hole, and 3-Hole) [ 32 ], and honeycomb spacers [ 33 ], were fabricated by 3D printing.…”