“…In particular, it has been found that when studying metallic clusters, the condensed Fukui functions can predict the results of nucleophilic and electrophilic interactions with poor reliability [ 105 ]. However, from the results obtained in our work, we can present four important considerations: (i) in the first place, it is not the same to obtain conclusions about the reliability of the condensed Fukui functions when studying metallic clusters or even solid systems than when considering pure organic molecules, as happens in our case; (ii) the reliability of the results that we have obtained is impressive because the condensed Fukui functions (and thus the dual descriptor) have been calculated using two different schemes for the partition of the electronic density (i.e., the atomic charges), and the same has been done for the Parr functions: the conclusions about the reaction sites are exactly the same; (iii) in our work, we considered and presented the calculation of the dual descriptor rather than the condensed Fukui functions, and it has been shown by Martínez-Araya that the dual descriptor is more reliable for predicting the electrophilic and nucleophilic sites than the condensed Fukui functions [ 106 ]; (iv) as we have shown in several previous works [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ], the reliability of the conceptual DFT descriptors for predicting the reactive sites of a given molecular system is heavily dependent on the goodness of the model chemistry employed for the calculations where we understand for goodness the ability to fulfill the KID procedure mentioned in the Introduction section.…”