2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Conceptual Foundation and Methodological Framework for Developing Urban Indicator of Heritage City

Abstract: This paper designed a conceptual framework for developing indicator by using indicator selection methodologies with a strong emphasis on intangible cultural for Heritage city. The pillars of this framework are policy context, theoretical perspectives and local issues. This framework developed based on bottom-up approach by using Stakeholder Consultation Model. It is a community based and holistic approach. It focused on local community participation and association with government policy objectives. This is du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are many contributions on the balance between heritage conservation and sustainability (e.g. Appendino, 2017), on built heritage protection policies (Mualam and Alterman, 2020), impact of built heritage on urban development (Tweed and Sutherland, 2007; Dogruyol et al , 2018), urban development and internal cohesion (Cervelló-Royo et al , 2012), development of urban indicator in heritage cities (Othman et al , 2013), drivers of land use change (Aravindakshan et al , 2020), none of these build a comprehensive theoretical framework for analyzing the urbanization process and sustainability challenges of cultural heritage. This is because, sustainable urban planning and heritage conservation have frequently covered completely different spheres (Teutonico and Matero, 2003), which makes the convergence of policies, tools and objectives of both sustainable heritage conservation and urban sustainable development difficult.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are many contributions on the balance between heritage conservation and sustainability (e.g. Appendino, 2017), on built heritage protection policies (Mualam and Alterman, 2020), impact of built heritage on urban development (Tweed and Sutherland, 2007; Dogruyol et al , 2018), urban development and internal cohesion (Cervelló-Royo et al , 2012), development of urban indicator in heritage cities (Othman et al , 2013), drivers of land use change (Aravindakshan et al , 2020), none of these build a comprehensive theoretical framework for analyzing the urbanization process and sustainability challenges of cultural heritage. This is because, sustainable urban planning and heritage conservation have frequently covered completely different spheres (Teutonico and Matero, 2003), which makes the convergence of policies, tools and objectives of both sustainable heritage conservation and urban sustainable development difficult.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a broader sense, cultural heritage is the result of human processes and activities in urban spaces, and is not a purely physical product [81], because by performing targeted human activities, it can provide the ground for tourism development and tourism attraction, so that by making the space dynamic and increasing the income level of stakeholders, it can play a role as a catalyst in the sustainable regeneration of these areas, and all these features are directly related to stakeholder training in the historic core of cities. This requires identification of the cultural heritage, moral values, social customs, and beliefs or myths of any cultural source [82]. The historic core of cities can also be seen as a cultural area that includes a collection of artistic facilities, institutions, and other sustainable items, such as museums, libraries, restaurants, and retail spaces [83].…”
Section: Sustainable Regeneration Of Historic Cores Of Cities With a mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban heritage represents an aesthetical perspective showcasing the time-lapsed evolution of urban development (Ertan and E gercio glu, 2016). A review of major studies in urban heritage areas found that generating, developing and protecting urban heritage assets can benefit current and future generations by helping them explore the cultural, political and historical character of cities where they work and live (Chohan and Ki, 2005;Othman et al, 2013;Rodwell, 2007). Further support is given by Guzman et al (2018) and Leus and Verhelst (2018) Sustainable urban heritage indicators that proper heritage conservation and restoration is an important contributor to sustainable development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban heritage represents an aesthetical perspective showcasing the time-lapsed evolution of urban development (Ertan and Eğercioğlu, 2016). A review of major studies in urban heritage areas found that generating, developing and protecting urban heritage assets can benefit current and future generations by helping them explore the cultural, political and historical character of cities where they work and live (Chohan and Ki, 2005; Othman et al. , 2013; Rodwell, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%