2017
DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v6i3.7624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Conceptual Framework Curriculum Evaluation Electrical Engineering Education

Abstract: This evaluation is a conceptual framework that has been analyzed in the hope that can help research related an evaluation of the curriculum. The Model of evaluation used was CIPPO model. CIPPO Model consists of context, input, process, product, and outcomes. On the dimension of the context includes the vision and mission of the study program, the purpose of the study program. On the input, dimension consists of learning achievements, curriculum structure, qualified lecturer, and course outline. On the dimensio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, based on the findings, the primary goal of quality assurance in VTE is to ensure quality graduates who will significantly contribute in terms of creativity and innovation to become active citizens in a global society and to have job knowledge capacity. These initiatives aim to better prepare graduates for practical career transitions for the country's socio-economic development (Imansari and Sutadji, 2018;Melaku, 2019;Oke and Olatilu, 2018). The criterion for HTMT is below 0.85 or 0.90 (Henseler et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, based on the findings, the primary goal of quality assurance in VTE is to ensure quality graduates who will significantly contribute in terms of creativity and innovation to become active citizens in a global society and to have job knowledge capacity. These initiatives aim to better prepare graduates for practical career transitions for the country's socio-economic development (Imansari and Sutadji, 2018;Melaku, 2019;Oke and Olatilu, 2018). The criterion for HTMT is below 0.85 or 0.90 (Henseler et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality teaching is fundamental to academic outcomes and education reform around the world because quality teaching and learning depend on the measurement and evaluation of teaching quality (Metsäpelto et al , 2021). Therefore, all institutions need to implement sound quality mechanisms and procedures based on a self-evaluation system to maintain the credibility of all stakeholders, especially the teachers, to become reflective practitioners and disseminate good practice in teaching and learning (Imansari and Sutadji, 2018). Wong et al (2020) stated that quality teaching is the pivot for students’ acquiring knowledge and skills.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CIPPO program evaluation model consists of five evaluation components: context, input, process, product, and outcome, which are an integral part of evaluating the program (Dressel et al, 2020;Jollymore et al, 2018). Outcome is a measure of performance based on the level of success that can be achieved based on the output of programs or activities that have been implemented (Imansari & Sutadji, 2017;Yuwono et al, 2020). The evaluation of the CIPPO program includes an evaluation of the impact of the program (Jollymore et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of input, the dimensions include academic performance, course structure, qualified lecturers, and course syllabus. The dimensions of the process include academic activities, implementation of industry practices, PPL and KKN, facilities and infrastructure, learning strategies, resources and learning media, and learning evaluation [7]. Eisenberg et al describes the development and evaluation of a 2-year longitudinal quality improvement (QI) and patient safety course that matches the teaching education and experiential learning in the pediatric emergency medicine scholarship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%