PsycEXTRA Dataset 2005
DOI: 10.1037/e577362012-016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conceptual framework for dynamic prioritization in multiple-task scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other key difference was (3) the processing logic utilized for prioritizing tasks. When a certain type of entity in the simulation reached the goal prioritization component, prioritization rules proposed originally in Zhang and Feyen (2005) were executed. Since the subjects understood how to do the experiment and the characteristics of all tasks were shown to the subject, subjects ideally would attend to both valence and temporal characteristics in order to maximize performance.…”
Section: Simulation Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The other key difference was (3) the processing logic utilized for prioritizing tasks. When a certain type of entity in the simulation reached the goal prioritization component, prioritization rules proposed originally in Zhang and Feyen (2005) were executed. Since the subjects understood how to do the experiment and the characteristics of all tasks were shown to the subject, subjects ideally would attend to both valence and temporal characteristics in order to maximize performance.…”
Section: Simulation Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier, Zhang and Feyen (2005) proposed a qualitative framework for predicting how people working in a multitasking scenario switch between concurrent tasks with dynamically changing priorities. This work has been followed up by conducting an empirical study on task switching and prioritization (Zhang and Feyen, 2007), evaluating a computational model of the same task derived from the qualitative framework and comparing the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier, Zhang and Feyen (2005) proposed a qualitative framework for predicting how people working in a multitasking scenario switch between concurrent tasks with dynamically changing priorities. This work has been followed up by conducting an empirical study on task switching and prioritization, evaluating a computational model of the same task derived from the qualitative framework and comparing the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
This paper describes an empirical study conducted to validate a computational model of dynamic task prioritization based on a framework proposed by Zhang and Feyen (2005). Three key factors in task prioritization were manipulated: processing time, available time, and task valence.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%