2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2010.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conceptual framework for public-private interplay in the telecommunications sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Regulatory policies should be directed from the asymmetric (legacy-based) regulatory paradigm to a more symmetric one focusing on an industry coordinating role and enabling cooperation models in the actual building and sharing of infrastructure (Gomez-Barroso & Feijoo, 2010;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulatory policies should be directed from the asymmetric (legacy-based) regulatory paradigm to a more symmetric one focusing on an industry coordinating role and enabling cooperation models in the actual building and sharing of infrastructure (Gomez-Barroso & Feijoo, 2010;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches to supply side or demand side incentives have been adopted by across the EU (see, for example, Gómez-Barroso & Feijóo, 2010b;Li, 2012;Nucciarelli, Sadowski, & Achard, 2010;Ragoobar, Whalley, & Harle, 2011;Ruhle, Brusic, Kittl, & Ehrler, 2011;Wee, Beltran, & Verbrugge, 2014). Different forms of publicprivate-partnerships have emerged, with the rationale for public involvement in the telecommunications sector being often geopolitical or strategic more than an economic one (Briglauer, Gugler, & Bohlin, 2013;Gómez-Barroso & Feijóo, 2010a). On a more general level, commentators like Buigues and Sekkat (2010) or Spector (2009), compare and contrast recent government approaches to state subsidies, industrial policies and other market interventions and found the share of GDP spent on public support is lower in the EU than in the US and argue for more research on specific public support policies.…”
Section: Market Liberalisation In the Telecommunications Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently the role of these partnerships on the allocation of incentives for private parties to foster investment has become a new line of research in the area of broadband diffusion (Falch & Henten, 2008;Howell, 2010;Sadowski, Nucciarelli, & de Rooij, 2009). In this context, public private interplay (PPI) is defined as an alternative means for public and private stakeholders to generate value by lowering risk and reducing uncertainty for private investment (Gomez-Barroso & Feijóo, 2010;. In the interplay between public and private stakeholders, two extreme models can be distinguished: the public utility model (i.e.…”
Section: The Economic Foundations Of Public Private Interplaymentioning
confidence: 99%