2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02504836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown that scaffolds benefit both instructional teaching and students' learning [40][41][42]. Ge et al [43] found that scaffolds can "support students to activate schemata, organize and retrieve knowledge, monitor and evaluate, and reflect on their learning". The effectiveness of different forms of scaffolding has been reviewed in some studies [22,44].…”
Section: Design Of An Inquiry-based Instructional Sequence Using Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that scaffolds benefit both instructional teaching and students' learning [40][41][42]. Ge et al [43] found that scaffolds can "support students to activate schemata, organize and retrieve knowledge, monitor and evaluate, and reflect on their learning". The effectiveness of different forms of scaffolding has been reviewed in some studies [22,44].…”
Section: Design Of An Inquiry-based Instructional Sequence Using Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, reflection prompts can serve multiple purposes in reflection tools, including instruction (how to reflect or improve work), motivation or reminding (of certain activities), coordination (e.g., of communication during reflection), or creating synergy and knowledge integration by merging experiences (Thillmann, Künsting, Wirth, & Leutner, 2009). The characteristic aspect of prompts is that the decision of how to react to a prompt is left to the user: the prompts balance freedom and structured reflection by providing effective yet unobtrusive support (e.g., Davis, 2000;Xun & Land, 2004). Researchers have shown that asking reflection participants questions in face-to-face situations helps collaborative reflection (e.g., Daudelin, 1996), which suggests that prompts may also be helpful in collaborative reflection.…”
Section: Designing Collaborative Reflection Support: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This usually takes the form of a verbal utterance or longer exchange; however, it can be a non-verbal cue or response to student activity (Dillenbourg & Crivelli, 2009). Xun and Land (2004) identified three kinds of prompts teachers employ to support collaboration: procedural, elaboration and reflection prompts. They argue that the more experienced the learners become, the less procedural prompts they will need, charting a shift towards reflective prompts which foster metacognitive processes.…”
Section: Pre-active Phasementioning
confidence: 99%