2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05363-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conceptual framework to evaluate human-robot collaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
103
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some evaluation frameworks that consider an overall human-centered perspective, i.e., focus on the intended end-users of the robot, in the interaction between humans and robots already exist (e.g., [ 73 , 74 , 75 ]). Recently, Hoffman [ 73 ] focuses on fluency as an indicator of the quality of the interaction in human-robot collaboration (HRC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some evaluation frameworks that consider an overall human-centered perspective, i.e., focus on the intended end-users of the robot, in the interaction between humans and robots already exist (e.g., [ 73 , 74 , 75 ]). Recently, Hoffman [ 73 ] focuses on fluency as an indicator of the quality of the interaction in human-robot collaboration (HRC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mechanisms may be the underlying pre-requisite for achieving mutual and subsequently ‘fluent’ interaction between humans and robots. Garvasi et al [ 74 ] have developed a general conceptual framework to evaluate the collaboration between humans and robots that encompasses many aspects of collaboration, in which human-centered usability issues are addressed. Both Hoffman [ 73 ] and Garvasi et al [ 74 ] focus on some human-centered aspects of the human operator in these present developed evaluation frameworks, but we intend to extend their human-centered approaches to a UX approach, based on the following motivations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct physical interaction of humans and robots without barriers means new safety risks for employees [29]. In order to minimize these, cobots are equipped with various integrated safety features defined by ISO/TS 15066:2016 [30] allowing high levels of automation in the vicinity of the operator [31], namely safety-rated monitored stop, speed and separation monitoring, power and force limiting, and hand guiding.…”
Section: Industrial Human-robot Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the position of humans and the cobot must be known at any time. The implementation can be carried out using different approaches such as 3D image processing or inertial motion capture suits [29]. In contrast to the safety-rated stop, the presence of persons does not necessarily lead to a stop in operation, but initially results in a slowing of the robot's movements.…”
Section: Industrial Human-robot Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation