2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.01.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conceptual system design study for an NBI beamline for the European DEMO

Abstract: Neutral Beam Injection (NBI) as a robust, established heating and current drive (CD) method is considered for the European DEMO. Like on ITER, an NBI system for DEMO will have to use negative ions as the neutralisation efficiency of positive ions vanishes at the required ≥ 800 keV beam energy. The required specifications of an NBI on DEMO go significantly beyond those on ITER, particularly when NBI is chosen to provide bulk current drive for a steady-state tokamak DEMO. The NBI beamline's power efficiency, on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The injector efficiency is the parameter which has to be improved most with respect to ITER (being currently only 26%), to make NBI a suitable solution for a fusion reactor. A crucial part of the NBI system determining the overall injector efficiency is the neutralizer [16], which has the task of neutralizing the negative ion beam. In ITER and present-day experiments (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The injector efficiency is the parameter which has to be improved most with respect to ITER (being currently only 26%), to make NBI a suitable solution for a fusion reactor. A crucial part of the NBI system determining the overall injector efficiency is the neutralizer [16], which has the task of neutralizing the negative ion beam. In ITER and present-day experiments (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivations to choose a design with four short beam blades, instead of two long beam blades as in the DEMO 2016 design [4], were that: • A more compact in height (or square-like) shape is more suitable both for a gas or a plasma neutralizer. In fact, for gas neutralizers the density distribution is more uniform with a compact shape, and for plasma neutralizers there are less plasma losses as the surface-to-volume ratio is smaller, as shown in [12].…”
Section: Updated Design Of the Demo Nbimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Adapting an energy recovery system for the residual ions to this injector (with the ion source at −1 MV) [13] is of limited interest due to the additional complexity; this would require collecting ions (D + and D − ) at a high voltage (resp. +1 MV and −1 MV) involving two additional invasive bushings (at ±1 MV) and SF 6 transmission lines.…”
Section: Efficiency Of the Neutral Beam Linementioning
confidence: 99%