1993
DOI: 10.1080/00268979300100641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A concerted rotation algorithm for atomistic Monte Carlo simulation of polymer melts and glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
329
1
18

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(352 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
329
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…More conventional MC algorithms which can be used to equilibrate polymer melts include reptation moves (generalized slithering snake algorithms), 5 configuration bias algorithms, [6][7][8] and concerted rotation algorithms. [8][9][10] Being relatively local, these methods work best for moderate chain lengths and densities. The complete equilibration of very long chain melts still requires long runs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More conventional MC algorithms which can be used to equilibrate polymer melts include reptation moves (generalized slithering snake algorithms), 5 configuration bias algorithms, [6][7][8] and concerted rotation algorithms. [8][9][10] Being relatively local, these methods work best for moderate chain lengths and densities. The complete equilibration of very long chain melts still requires long runs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main factor for the success of MC in polymer modelling is the development, over the years, of highly sophisticated algorithms which are able to sample very efficiently the phase space of polymeric systems at varied levels of chemical detail. For example in atomistic simulations such localized moves include, among others, the configurational bias (CB) (de Pablo et al, 1992a(de Pablo et al, , 1992bLaso et al, 1992;Siepmann and Frenkel, 1992) and the concerted rotation (ConRot) (Dodd et al, 1993) algorithms. Full-scale, robust equilibration even for very long chains is ensured through the application of advanced, chain-connectivity-altering moves: the end-bridging (EB) (Mavrantzas et al, 1999;Pant and Theodorou, 1995) and the double-bridging (DB) (Karayiannis et al, 2002a(Karayiannis et al, , 2002b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has recently been questioned whether this bound is tight [5,8,24]. Algorithms are available to compute the values of f −1 when n = 3, for instance the elegant analytical method developed in [5], but they only return the values of f −1 for given poses of T .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%