2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A concise algorithm for calculating absorption height in spray tower for wet limestone–gypsum flue gas desulfurization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purification involves removing solid particles, nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides. Desulfurization of gases is most often carried out with a wet lime method, consisting of spraying the gases with a solution of lime milk or limestone [1][2][3]. The desulfurization product is calcium sulfate -gypsum [4,5], which is separated from the wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purification involves removing solid particles, nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides. Desulfurization of gases is most often carried out with a wet lime method, consisting of spraying the gases with a solution of lime milk or limestone [1][2][3]. The desulfurization product is calcium sulfate -gypsum [4,5], which is separated from the wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the main instruments used in wet desulfurization include rotating packed beds, impinging stream reactors, and absorption towers, and the desulfurization rates of these three instruments are ≥ 80%, ≥ 90%, and 68%-90%, respectively (Chang et al, 2011;Gong and Yang, 2011;Wang et al, 2015;Kobayashi et al, 2016). Absorption towers are widely used in the desulfurization industry, but they exhibit problems such as a large land area required, high operation cost, and equipment corrosion and fouling (Michalski, 2000;Bao et al, 2012;Zhu et al, 2015). Although some wet flue-gas desulfurization (WFGD) technologies are available, more cost-effective and efficient equipment and technologies still need to be developed for the industry environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers point out smaller droplet diameter is beneficial for mass transfer but will cause local entrainment of droplets when droplet diameter is too small . However, they just use a droplet diameter, which is big enough to keep falling down in the whole column, then when the desulfurization efficiency cannot be afforded, a higher liquid flow rate is used to achieve the goal (Neveux: L/G = 20, u g = 2.33 m/s, d = 1.7 mm; Warych: L/G = 8–15, u g = 3 m/s, d = 2 mm–3 mm; Zhu: L/G = 10–20, u g = 2–4, d = 2‐3 mm; Gerbec: L/G = 36, u g = 2.09 m/s, d = 2.7 mm; Lin: L/G = 15, u g = 1.95 m/s). Two features can be found in these typical examples: (a) The gas velocity is not large, which can prevent the entrainment, but it will decrease the throughput of the column; (b) The L/G is large to provide sufficient interfacial area for mass transfer, but in a relatively big droplet diameter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%