2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11759-013-9230-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Concise Legal History of the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and a Comparative Analysis of the 1935 Roerich Pact and the 1954 Hague Convention in the Context of the Law of War

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…166 Schröder (2012) 193-277. 167 Similar Wieacker (1967 Hammer (1995) with regard to Germany; Schipper / Frank (2013), for the protection of cultural property in public international law of war; Odendahl (2005), with a multi-level approach; see also Vrdoljak (2006) for the role of the museums. For a very coherent and fruitful study on the case of Norway, see Eriksen (2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…166 Schröder (2012) 193-277. 167 Similar Wieacker (1967 Hammer (1995) with regard to Germany; Schipper / Frank (2013), for the protection of cultural property in public international law of war; Odendahl (2005), with a multi-level approach; see also Vrdoljak (2006) for the role of the museums. For a very coherent and fruitful study on the case of Norway, see Eriksen (2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%